Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40852044›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in reproductive health2025

Use of modern contraceptives on the basis of disability severity in Uganda: analysis of the 2016 demographic and health survey.

Tara Casebolt, Molly Hardiman, Taylor Diaz-Leon Guerrero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tara CaseboltDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Parkinson School of Health Sciences and Public Health, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Molly HardimanMorrissey College of Arts and Sciences, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, United States.
Taylor Diaz-Leon GuerreroMorrissey College of Arts and Sciences, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Women with disabilities have faced difficulties with accessing family planning services for decades and in many different settings. These women have both been denied access to contraception because of an inaccurate belief of the asexuality of people with disabilities and been forced or coerced into using contraceptives because of the belief they should not have children. Objective: This study uses Demographic and Health Survey data to analyze the association between disability and modern contraceptive use in Uganda. A disability severity indicator was used based upon recommendations from the Washington Group on Disability Statistics. Methods: Bivariate analysis was performed using chi-squares to determine if a significant association exists between modern contraceptive use and disability. Logistic regressions were run to generate odds ratios for crude adjusted models which took demographic data and covariates into consideration. Results: Disability was not found to be significantly associated with modern contraceptive use. Women with disabilities did not have significantly different odds of using a modern form of contraceptive when compared to women without disabilities in both the crude and adjusted models. Conclusions: These findings are inconsistent with previous studies conducted in Uganda. Additional research should be conducted to determine if there are disparities in the type of contraceptive used, sustainability of the method, and whether there is an unmet need for contraceptives. Based on the findings of this study, it is clear that women with disabilities use contraceptives. Therefore, it is essential for family planning services to be accessible to women regardless of functional limitations.

Indexed as

accessibilitybirth controlcontraceptiondisabilityfamily planningUganda

Identifiers

PMID40852044
PMCPMC12367744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.