ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
First case of penile porokeratosis from Nepal: a case report.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: Porokeratosis is a rare keratinization disorder marked by atrophic patches with a distinct hyperkeratotic border known as a cornoid lamella. Genital porokeratosis (GP), especially involving the penis, is extremely uncommon, with only a handful of cases reported worldwide. This case report describes the first instance of penile porokeratosis from Nepal, highlighting its rarity and clinical presentation. Case presentation: A 22-year-old male presented with a 3 × 3 cm annular plaque on the shaft of his penis, which had been asymptomatic for a year. Histopathology confirmed the diagnosis of porokeratosis, and tests for sexually transmitted infections were negative. Following a single session of cryotherapy, the patient was counseled about the benign nature of the lesion. Regular follow-ups were scheduled every 4 weeks for additional cryotherapy and to monitor for any potential malignant change. Discussion: GP is a rare condition, potentially triggered by environmental factors like heat and friction. Diagnosis can be challenging due to its similarity to other dermatoses, making histopathology essential. Although other forms of porokeratosis carry a risk of malignancy, there are no known cases of GP progressing to cancer. Conclusion: Penile porokeratosis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of persistent genital lesions. A biopsy is crucial for accurate diagnosis, as misdiagnosis can delay appropriate treatment. Further studies are needed to better understand this rare disease, including its incidence, pathophysiology, and risk of malignant transformation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.