Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40851972›Full record

ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025

A narrative review on ethical considerations and challenges in AI-driven cardiology.

Dev Patel, Chandramouli Chetarajupalli, Saad Khan, Surayya Khan, Tirath Patel, Samuel Joshua, Richard M Millis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. The Emerging Role of Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Care: From Imaging to Predictive Analytics.Heart views : the official journal of the Gulf Heart Association · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dev PatelLokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College, Mumbai, India.
Chandramouli ChetarajupalliZhengzhou University, Henan, PR China.
Saad KhanSaidu Medical College, Saidu Sharif, Pakistan.
Surayya KhanKhyber Medical University, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Tirath PatelSchool of Medicine, Trinity Medical Sciences University, Ratho Mill Kingstown, Saint Vincent and Grenadines.
Samuel JoshuaDepartment of Clinical Anatomy and Medical Imaging, American University of Antigua, College of Medicine, Coolidge, Antigua.
Richard M MillisDepartment of Medical Physiology, American University of Antigua College of Medicine, Antigua.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing cardiology by enhancing diagnostic precision, prognostic accuracy, and treatment planning. Its integration raises ethical concerns like bias, privacy, accountability, and the risk of dehumanizing healthcare. This review focuses on navigating these challenges while maximizing AI's potential in patient care. Methodology and aims: A narrative review was conducted to explore the ethical challenges associated with AI in cardiology. Key areas of focus included bias in training datasets, data privacy, the "black-box" nature of AI systems, and the need for transparency and accountability in clinical decision-making. Results and critical insights: AI improves accuracy in diagnosing and managing cardiovascular conditions but presents risks such as exacerbating healthcare disparities and challenges in patient data security. Strategies include creating ethical frameworks, integrating diverse datasets, and emphasizing the importance of clinician-AI collaboration to ensure equitable outcomes. Conclusion and limitations: AI offers transformative opportunities for cardiology, yet its success hinges on addressing ethical, technical, and regulatory challenges. Robust frameworks promoting fairness, transparency, and privacy are crucial. Limitations include a lack of real-world validation and the need for ongoing oversight to adapt to evolving clinical demands.

Indexed as

accuracyartificial intelligencecardiologydata privacyethics

Identifiers

PMID40851972
PMCPMC12369719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.