ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
The relation between C-reactive protein (CRP) and risk of incident heart failure in patients with cardiovascular disease: a narrative review.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Hs-CRP as a biomarker for atherosclerosis progression and cardiovascular risk: a systematic review.PeerJ · 2026Pooled it
- The C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index as a predictor of mortality in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting.Irish journal of medical science · 2026Article
- Article
- Inflammation and Cardiovascular Risk: A Systematic Review of High-Sensitivity CRP as a Prognostic Indicator.Cureus · 2026Review
- Chronic Insomnia and Stroke Risk-A Real Bidirectional Issue.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a leading global cause of morbidity and mortality, with heart failure (HF) significantly contributing to this burden. Elevated C-reactive protein (CRP), a biomarker of systemic inflammation, has been implicated in the pathogenesis of various cardiovascular conditions, including HF. This narrative review examines the relationship between CRP levels and the risk of incident HF in patients with pre-existing CVD. By synthesizing findings from prospective cohort studies, clinical trials, and meta-analyses, we aim to assess the potential role of CRP as a predictive biomarker for HF onset. Inflammation is a critical component in HF pathophysiology, contributing to myocardial remodeling, fibrosis, and endothelial dysfunction. High-sensitivity CRP (hs-CRP) assays allow for the detection of low-grade inflammation, offering improved risk stratification for cardiovascular events. Studies indicate that elevated hs-CRP levels correlate with an increased risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, and HF development. However, CRP's specificity as a marker remains a challenge due to its association with various systemic inflammatory conditions. Recent research has explored CRP's role in HF subtypes, particularly HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Despite growing evidence linking CRP to HF, gaps remain in understanding its mechanistic role, optimal clinical thresholds, and therapeutic implications. Future research should focus on mechanistic studies elucidating CRP's direct impact on myocardial dysfunction, subgroup-specific analyses, and interventional trials targeting CRP-driven inflammation. Addressing these gaps could significantly improve HF prevention and management by leveraging CRP as a viable prognostic and therapeutic target.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.