ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Recurrent postcoital syncope due to a vagal response triggered by deep penetration: a case report.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: Postcoital syncope (PCS) is a rare, transient loss of consciousness during or after sexual intercourse, often linked to an exaggerated vagal response. The condition is poorly understood, underdiagnosed, and can significantly impact patients' quality of life and intimate relationships. Differentiating PCS from other potential causes of syncope is essential for accurate diagnosis and management. Case presentation: A 34-year-old woman with no notable medical history presented with recurrent episodes of syncope during sexual intercourse, primarily triggered by deep penetration. These episodes were characterized by dizziness, bradycardia, hypotension, and brief loss of consciousness, typically resolving spontaneously. Her clinical examination and echocardiography (ECG) were normal. A tilt table test was performed, revealing a significant vagal-mediated response, supporting a diagnosis of PCS. Clinical discussion: PCS remains a challenging diagnosis due to its rarity and the difficulty in distinguishing it from other causes of syncope. It is thought to occur due to an exaggerated vagal response, triggered by deep cervical or pelvic stimulation during intercourse. Cardiovascular and neurological causes should be ruled out through comprehensive evaluation, including ECG, echocardiography, and tilt table testing. Treatment mainly focuses on lifestyle changes, such as avoiding specific sexual positions, and psychological counseling to address any anxiety or emotional distress linked to the episodes. Conclusion: PCS, though rare, is typically benign and can be managed effectively with non-pharmacological approaches. A thorough evaluation to exclude other causes, alongside patient education and psychological support, can help alleviate symptoms and improve overall quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.