Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40851903›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2025

Large language models in clinical nutrition: an overview of its applications, capabilities, limitations, and potential future prospects.

Jamal Belkhouribchia, Joeri Jan Pen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jamal BelkhouribchiaEndocrinology Center Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium.
Joeri Jan PenDepartment of Nutrition, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of large language models (LLMs) into clinical nutrition marks a transformative advancement, offering promising solutions for enhancing patient care, personalizing dietary recommendations, and supporting evidence-based clinical decision-making. Trained on extensive text corpora and powered by transformer-based architectures, LLMs demonstrate remarkable capabilities in natural language understanding and generation. This review provides an overview of their current and potential applications in clinical nutrition, focusing on key technologies including prompt engineering, fine-tuning, retrieval-augmented generation, and multimodal integration. These enhancements increase domain relevance, factual accuracy, and contextual responsiveness, enabling LLMs to deliver more reliable outputs in nutrition-related tasks. Recent studies have shown LLMs' utility in dietary planning, nutritional education, obesity management, and malnutrition risk assessment. Despite these advances, challenges remain. Limitations in reasoning, factual accuracy, and domain specificity, along with risks of bias and hallucination, underscore the need for rigorous validation and human oversight. Furthermore, ethical considerations, environmental costs, and infrastructural integration must be addressed before widespread adoption. Future directions include combining LLMs with predictive analytics, integrating them with electronic health records and wearables, and adapting them for multilingual, culturally sensitive dietary guidance. LLMs also hold potential as research and educational tools, assisting in literature synthesis and patient engagement. Their transformative promise depends on cross-disciplinary collaboration, responsible deployment, and clinician training. Ultimately, while LLMs are not a replacement for healthcare professionals, they offer powerful augmentation tools for delivering scalable, personalized, and data-driven nutritional care in an increasingly complex healthcare environment.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclinical nutritionlarge language modelspersonalized dietary recommendationspersonalized nutrition therapyretrieval-augmented generation large language models

Identifiers

PMID40851903
PMCPMC12367769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.