ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2025
Large language models in clinical nutrition: an overview of its applications, capabilities, limitations, and potential future prospects.
Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Generative AI in Precision Nutrition: A Review of Current Developments and Future Directions.Nutrients · 2026Pooled it
- Domain-Dependent Performance of Human Experts and AI Systems in Pediatric Menu Evaluation.Nutrients · 2026Observational
- Comparative Performance of AI Models and Clinicians in Evidence-Based Cardiovascular Disease Management for People Living With HIV: Comparative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Applying Artificial Intelligence and machine learning in precision nutrition.Nature communications · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in nephrology: predicting CKD progression and personalizing treatment.International urology and nephrology · 2026Review
- Large Language Models as Clinical Nutrition Decision Tools: Quantitative Bias and Guideline Deviation in Type 2 Diabetes Meal Planning.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Technophobia and Its Associated Factors Among Registered Nurses in China: A Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Risk Management of Large Language Model-Based Exercise and Health Guidance: A China-Anchored, Comparatively Informed Six-Dimensional Trigger Matrix and Lifecycle Governance Framework for the Wellness-to-SaMD Continuum.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Review
- Parents' Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence-Supported Pediatric Healthcare Services: A Descriptive and Correlational Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Exploratory benchmarking of AI-generated diet plans for inherited protein metabolism disorders: a simulation-based evaluation of nutritional accuracy and clinical safety.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence diet plans underestimate nutrient intake compared to dietitians in adolescents.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Large Language Models for Real-World Nutrition Assessment: Structured Prompts, Multi-Model Validation and Expert Oversight.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Nutrigenomics meets multi-omics: integrating genetic, metabolic, and microbiome data for personalized nutrition strategies.Genes & nutrition · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of large language models (LLMs) into clinical nutrition marks a transformative advancement, offering promising solutions for enhancing patient care, personalizing dietary recommendations, and supporting evidence-based clinical decision-making. Trained on extensive text corpora and powered by transformer-based architectures, LLMs demonstrate remarkable capabilities in natural language understanding and generation. This review provides an overview of their current and potential applications in clinical nutrition, focusing on key technologies including prompt engineering, fine-tuning, retrieval-augmented generation, and multimodal integration. These enhancements increase domain relevance, factual accuracy, and contextual responsiveness, enabling LLMs to deliver more reliable outputs in nutrition-related tasks. Recent studies have shown LLMs' utility in dietary planning, nutritional education, obesity management, and malnutrition risk assessment. Despite these advances, challenges remain. Limitations in reasoning, factual accuracy, and domain specificity, along with risks of bias and hallucination, underscore the need for rigorous validation and human oversight. Furthermore, ethical considerations, environmental costs, and infrastructural integration must be addressed before widespread adoption. Future directions include combining LLMs with predictive analytics, integrating them with electronic health records and wearables, and adapting them for multilingual, culturally sensitive dietary guidance. LLMs also hold potential as research and educational tools, assisting in literature synthesis and patient engagement. Their transformative promise depends on cross-disciplinary collaboration, responsible deployment, and clinician training. Ultimately, while LLMs are not a replacement for healthcare professionals, they offer powerful augmentation tools for delivering scalable, personalized, and data-driven nutritional care in an increasingly complex healthcare environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.