Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40851846›Full record

ArticleJB & JS open access

Direct Healthcare Cost of Fracture-related Infection Treatment.

Nike Walter, Ines Neubauer, Susanne Baertl, Volker Alt, Markus Rupp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Epidemiology and healthcare burden of implant-associated complications in Germany: a nationwide population-based analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nike WalterDepartment for Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0654-2076
Ines NeubauerDepartment for Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2380-5907
Susanne BaertlDepartment for Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5326-7273
Volker AltDepartment for Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg.
Markus RuppDepartment for Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7221-3783

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Fracture-related infections (FRIs) pose significant clinical and economic challenges in trauma surgery. Despite advancements in treatment modalities, the economic burden of managing FRIs remains substantial. However, cost analyses are scarce. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the direct healthcare costs associated with FRI treatment compared with initial fracture treatment across various fracture types in a level 1 trauma center in Germany. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 95 patients treated for fractures and FRIs between 2013 and 2020 was conducted. Patients were categorized based on the fracture location: femur, tibia, ankle, and foot. Data collected included fracture characteristics, and costs related to both initial fracture treatment and FRI management. Costs were analyzed using diagnosis-related group (DRG) reimbursement data. The mean DRG reimbursement for initial fracture treatment and FRI treatment was compared to determine the economic impact of FRIs. Results: The study revealed significant increases in costs for FRI treatment across all fracture types. For femur fractures, the mean reimbursement for initial treatment was €17,617.66, while FRI treatment costs were €31,731.49, resulting in a difference of €14,113.83 and a 1.8-fold increase in costs. Tibia fractures showed an increase from €10,327.70 to €28,024.38 (difference of €17,696.68, 2.7-fold increase of costs). Ankle fractures had a cost increase from €3,790.38 to €17,940.90 (difference of €14,150.52, 4.7-fold increase of costs), and foot fractures showed an increase from €6,557.95 to €23,272.48 (difference of €16,714.53, 3.5-fold increase of costs). Conclusions: The costs for FRI treatment are substantially higher than those for initial fracture management across all fracture types studied. These findings emphasize the need for effective preventive measures and efficient management protocols to reduce the incidence and financial impact of FRIs. Level of Evidence: Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Identifiers

PMID40851846
PMCPMC12367026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.