ArticleJB & JS open access
Use of a "Fascial-Sock" Technique to Manage the Stump and Stoma After Insertion of an Osseointegrated Implant in Transfemoral Amputees.
Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: We describe a new surgical technique to improve the stability of the peristomal skin around an osseointegrated implant in transfemoral amputees. As a secondary effect, the technique makes it easier to shape the residual limb into a cone and reduces the need for more complex revision surgery in the years after surgery. Methods: We compared outcomes in 2 groups of unilateral, transfemoral amputees by 18 months after insertion of an osseointegrated prosthetic limb implant. In Group 1, the soft tissues were managed using a standard muscle-platform technique. In Group 2, the soft tissues were managed using a fascial-sock technique. Rates of peristomal infection requiring treatment with oral antibiotics, rates of peristomal enthesopathy pain, surgical revision rates, and effectiveness of peristomal skin adhesion to the underlying bone were assessed. Results: Rates of peristomal skin infection were 50% lower in Group 2. Rates of treatment for enthesopathy pain were 50% lower in Group 2. Surgical revision rates were the same in both groups. However, the need to revise the stoma specifically was 50% lower in Group 2 and the nature of the revision procedures in Group 2 were less complicated (mainly for soft-tissue overhangs). By contrast, the need for bony debridement as part of the revision procedure was 4 X greater in Group 1 compared with Group 2. Finally, we were 1.8 X more likely to achieve a dry and stable stoma by 18 months using a fascial sock approach. Conclusion: Use of a fascial sock approach appears to be associated with improved rates of stability of the peristomal soft tissues, leading to decreased morbidity from this area at 18 months after treatment with an OI implant. Level of Evidence: Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.