Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40851787›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2025

The depth structure of a good birth: reconfiguring the environment in a high-risk labour ward birth and creating sanctuary behind a screen.

Jane Clossick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jane ClossickAAD Cities, School of Art, Architecture and Design, London Metropolitan University, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article explores how the spatial, relational, and sensory conditions within an obstetric-led hospital birth room were subtly reconfigured to support a safe, satisfying birth, even though the birth in question was considered high risk. Drawing on autoethnographic reflections and interviews with caregivers from the author's own birth at the National Health Service Royal London Hospital, the paper examines the transformation of a standard labour ward room through a low-tech intervention: the erection of a cloth screen brought from home. This simple act created a distinct spatial zone in which institutional norms were less prevalent, fostering privacy, autonomy, and integrative care practices that protected physiological labour and enhanced maternal agency. The article situates this personal narrative within broader theoretical frameworks of birth territory, sociospatial theory, environmental psychology, and institutional power, arguing that space and care interact in complex ways to shape birth experiences. It contributes to calls for more humanised, woman-centred approaches to birth architecture and practice, particularly in highly techno-rational and medicalised settings, and proposes that even small acts of spatial resistance have the potential to generate meaningful shifts in care culture.

Indexed as

birth environmentsbirthing people’s autonomybirth territoriesbirth unit designhigh-risk birthmidwifery careobstetric carephysiological birth

Identifiers

PMID40851787
PMCPMC12367737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.