ArticleNIHR open research2024
Exploring the potential of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) for tailored pulmonary rehabilitation in people with interstitial lung disease (ILD): A systematic review protocol.
Article in NIHR open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Utilisation of cardiopulmonary exercise testing for tailored pulmonary rehabilitation in people with interstitial lung diseases: A systematic review.Clinical rehabilitation · 2026Pooled it
- Integrated heart rate and oxygen uptake recovery phenotypes reveal heterogeneous recovery patterns in coronary artery disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This review aims to identify which cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) derived variables can be used to personalise pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) for people with interstitial lung diseases. A 'one size fits all' approach does not benefit every patient due to a multitude of unique characteristics, subsets and phenotypes. No ILD-specific, tailored pulmonary rehabilitation guidelines exist in this area and exercise programme development is lacking. This leads to wide variation in the success within the literature and clinical practice. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews will be searched to identify studies that utilise CPET variables for PR development. Quality assessment is to be performed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) checklists for single cohort studies and randomised controlled studies. Discussion: The primary outcomes found within the included studies for peak volume of oxygen consumption (VO Registration: In accordance with the guidelines, this systematic review protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 07 May 2024 (registration number CRD42024543174).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.