ArticleBrain and neuroscience advances
Breaking barriers towards credible research: Outcomes of a workshop at the BNA Festival of Neuroscience 2025.
Article in Brain and neuroscience advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the specific barriers and possible solutions to credible research for early career researchers is key to enabling the next generation of scientists to implement these practices. Here we describe the outcomes of a workshop that tackled these issues, held at the BNA Festival of Neuroscience 2025. Workshop attendees highlighted various challenges to credible research that are highly relevant for early career researchers. In particular, time constraints were highlighted as a universal barrier across multiple credible research practices, and attitudes of more senior researchers/supervisors were perceived as an important challenge. Participants also highlighted solutions to help implement credible research that can be pursued by individual researchers, but, importantly, also emphasised the importance of "structural" solutions, requiring initiative by stakeholders, including academic institutions, journals and funders. We hope the summary of the workshop will foster active debate on the topic within the neuroscience community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.