ReviewCureus2025
Predictive Ability of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in Pediatric Respiratory Disease Diagnosis Using Cough Sounds: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictors of prognosis in children under six years of age with recurrent croup: a retrospective cohort study.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Asthma Management: Opportunities and Challenges for Modern Healthcare.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- ATF-MGIAM: Medically-guided interpretable attention mapping for robust pertussis cough sound recognition.PloS one · 2026Article
- Resurgence of pertussis: whopping the '100-day cough'.Current opinion in pediatrics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Respiratory diseases, including pneumonia, asthma, bronchiolitis, and croup, remain the leading causes of pediatric morbidity and mortality worldwide. Diagnostic challenges persist, especially in low-resource settings lacking specialized tools. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based analysis of cough sounds has emerged as a promising, noninvasive diagnostic alternative. This systematic review synthesizes evidence on the predictive ability of AI algorithms for diagnosing specific pediatric respiratory diseases using cough sounds, evaluating their diagnostic performance, clinical applicability, and methodological quality. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, six studies were included from 270 records identified in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore databases. Eligible studies evaluated AI models such as logistic regression, convolutional neural networks (CNNs), support vector machines (SVMs), and hybrid feature-based approaches that combined acoustic and spectral features for disease classification. Techniques like wavelet-based feature extraction and late fusion, where outputs from multiple models are combined at the decision level, were reported to improve diagnostic accuracy. Sensitivity ranged from 82% to 94%, and specificity from 71% to 91% across studies, indicating high diagnostic potential, with some AI models outperforming conventional diagnostic methods such as the World Health Organization (WHO) clinical algorithms. Risk-of-bias assessment using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) revealed concerns in four studies (67%), mainly due to retrospective designs, small sample sizes (ranging from 65 to 585 participants), and lack of external validation. Study limitations included heterogeneous outcome definitions and insufficient reporting of model calibration. Overall, AI-driven cough sound analysis demonstrates significant promise as a rapid, scalable diagnostic tool for pediatric respiratory diseases, particularly in resource-limited settings. Future research should focus on prospective multicenter validation, transparent reporting of methodological details and performance metrics, and integration into clinical workflows to ensure safe and effective real-world implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.