Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40851747›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Predictive Ability of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in Pediatric Respiratory Disease Diagnosis Using Cough Sounds: A Systematic Review.

Aya Abuelgasim Ibrahim Abdelhalim, Hanady Me M Osman, Sally Ibrahim Hafez Sadaka, Mohammed Abdelrahman Yousif Mohammed, Eman Eissa, Rasha Abdalla, Dilal Haroun Mohamad Hassan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Resurgence of pertussis: whopping the '100-day cough'.Current opinion in pediatrics · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aya Abuelgasim Ibrahim AbdelhalimEmergency Medicine, Najran Armed Forces Hospital, Ministry of Defense Health Services, Najran, SAU.
Hanady Me M OsmanQuality and Patient Safety, Najran Armed Forces Hospital, Ministry of Defense Health Services, Najran, SAU.
Sally Ibrahim Hafez SadakaPediatrics, Najran Armed Forces Hospital, Ministry of Defense Health Services, Najran, SAU.
Mohammed Abdelrahman Yousif MohammedNeonatal Intensive Care, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, GBR.
Eman EissaPediatrics, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Maidstone, GBR.
Rasha AbdallaPediatrics, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Maidstone, GBR.
Dilal Haroun Mohamad HassanPediatric Emergency, Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib Medical Group, Jeddah, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Respiratory diseases, including pneumonia, asthma, bronchiolitis, and croup, remain the leading causes of pediatric morbidity and mortality worldwide. Diagnostic challenges persist, especially in low-resource settings lacking specialized tools. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based analysis of cough sounds has emerged as a promising, noninvasive diagnostic alternative. This systematic review synthesizes evidence on the predictive ability of AI algorithms for diagnosing specific pediatric respiratory diseases using cough sounds, evaluating their diagnostic performance, clinical applicability, and methodological quality. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, six studies were included from 270 records identified in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore databases. Eligible studies evaluated AI models such as logistic regression, convolutional neural networks (CNNs), support vector machines (SVMs), and hybrid feature-based approaches that combined acoustic and spectral features for disease classification. Techniques like wavelet-based feature extraction and late fusion, where outputs from multiple models are combined at the decision level, were reported to improve diagnostic accuracy. Sensitivity ranged from 82% to 94%, and specificity from 71% to 91% across studies, indicating high diagnostic potential, with some AI models outperforming conventional diagnostic methods such as the World Health Organization (WHO) clinical algorithms. Risk-of-bias assessment using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) revealed concerns in four studies (67%), mainly due to retrospective designs, small sample sizes (ranging from 65 to 585 participants), and lack of external validation. Study limitations included heterogeneous outcome definitions and insufficient reporting of model calibration. Overall, AI-driven cough sound analysis demonstrates significant promise as a rapid, scalable diagnostic tool for pediatric respiratory diseases, particularly in resource-limited settings. Future research should focus on prospective multicenter validation, transparent reporting of methodological details and performance metrics, and integration into clinical workflows to ensure safe and effective real-world implementation.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecough sound analysisdiagnostic accuracymachine learningpediatric respiratory diseasessystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40851747
PMCPMC12368924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.