ArticleCureus2025
Enhancing Clinical Documentation: The Effect of Structured Templates on Follow-Up Notes in a Low-Resource Hospital Setting.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing Large-Volume Paracentesis in a Gastroenterology Ward: A Two-Cycle Quality Improvement Project.Cureus · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate and structured clinical documentation is essential for delivering high-quality patient care. While structured documentation tools have been increasingly adopted in well-resourced healthcare settings, many low-resource environments, such as Sudan, continue to rely predominantly on traditional, unstructured methods. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of implementing structured documentation practices in improving the quality of clinical notes at Hasahesa Hospital. METHODOLOGY: A mixed retrospective and prospective audit was conducted in two cycles at Hasahesa Hospital. The first cycle involved a retrospective review of 50 clinical records from July 2023, assessed using a standardized checklist developed based on National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines. Following a targeted training intervention, the second cycle prospectively evaluated another 50 clinical records from September 2023. Documentation quality was measured by compliance with ten key parameters. Data analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel, with compliance rates compared between the two cycles.
resultsThere were significant improvements in documentation quality following the intervention, with overall compliance increased from 38.2% to 87.2% (
conclusionsThe introduction of structured documentation significantly improved the completeness and quality of follow-up clinical notes at Hasahesa Hospital. Despite these improvements, areas such as history of present illness, past medical history, and current medications require continued attention to achieve optimal compliance. These findings emphasize the necessity of ongoing staff training and the use of standardized templates to maintain and further enhance documentation standards, thereby optimizing patient care. Future audits should also explore expanding structured documentation practices across other hospital departments and settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.