ArticleCureus2025
Gyroscopic Stereotactic Radiosurgery: A Retrospective Analysis.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stereotactic radiosurgery using a self-shielded gyroscopic radiosurgery system for meningiomas: technical aspects and dosimetric results.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Article
- Initial Clinical Outcomes in the Treatment of Brain Metastasis With Gyroscopic Radiosurgery at a Single Institution.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a safe and effective non-invasive treatment for both primary and secondary brain tumors. Recently, a gyroscopic frameless, self-contained, and self-shielded radiosurgery system has been clinically implemented. The device is equipped with a 2.7-MV linear accelerator, capable of delivering up to 1500 MU/minute, and onboard image guidance for initial setup and tracking. Herein, we present our institution's initial experience with this novel system. Methodology Between September 2020 and July 2023, 30 patients (77%) with brain metastases, 8 patients (20.5%) with benign skull base tumors, and 1 patient (2.5%) with an arteriovenous malformation were treated for a total of 107 lesions (1-11 lesions per patient) using 243 radiation fractions, with each patient receiving between 1 and 5 fractions. Results The median delivered fractional dose was 1350 cGy (range, 500-2,400 cGy) in 3 fractions (range, 1-5) for a total dose of 2,400 cGy (range, 1,200-3,500 cGy) prescribed to the 63% isodose line (range, 50%-85%). The median lesion volume was 1.1 cc (range, 0.04-28.04 cc). The median parametric values of conformity, homogeneity, and dose falloff were calculated: confidence interval (CI) = 1.43 (1.21-1.86), homogeneity index (HI) = 1.52 (1.14-2.00), and gradient index 50 (GI50) = 3.16 (2.49-4.88). Median treatment time was 24 minutes per lesion (range, 9-123 minutes), and median isocenters per lesion was 4 (range, 1-15), with a median of 74 beams per lesion delivered (range, 23-195). Acute toxicities were limited to 6 (16.2%) patients. Late toxicity was limited to seven lesions, causing radiation necrosis, five symptomatic, and one patient with a case of Bell's palsy. No grade 4+ toxicity was observed. At a median follow-up of 14.7 months (range, 2.4-46.3), local control was 95%. Conclusions This is among the largest gyroscopic radiosurgery clinical experiences published to date. The results show that local control and toxicity results align with historical control data for patients treated with other SRS modalities, demonstrating the functionality, performance efficiency, and dosimetric benefits of this new radiosurgery platform.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.