ReviewCureus2025
Impact of Single-Family Room Care on Neonatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nurse-led family integrated care and time to first parent-infant holding in very preterm infants (< 32 weeks): a multi-site pre-post quasi-experimental study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Skin-to-skin contact in neonatal intensive care units: a narrative review of implementation challenges and strategies within infant- and family-centered care.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Environmental exposures in the neonatal intensive care unit impacting neurodevelopmental outcomes for neonates.Pediatric research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The primary aim of the present study is to examine the literature regarding the advantages and disadvantages of single-family room (SFR) care for neonatal outcomes. The researchers used the systematic review approach, where several databases were used, including PubMed, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Cochrane, and Scopus, using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) as a methodological path to identify, screen, and select the studies that were included in the current research and analyzed to extract the information needed for the achievement of the research objectives. The results revealed that neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) can be improved structurally and operationally, which may lead to better outcomes for premature infants and their families. One promising strategy is to provide SFRs within the NICU. SFRs increase the chances for a neonate and their family to have uninterrupted time together.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.