ArticleJournal of agricultural, biological, and environmental statistics2025
New capture-recapture models of behavioral response for estimating the size of a closed animal population.
Article in Journal of agricultural, biological, and environmental statistics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Capture-recapture (CRC) experiments conducted over discrete time points motivate the development of models characterizing animal behavioral responses to facilitate estimating sizes of closed animal populations. We propose a multinomial distribution-based CRC modeling framework allowing for flexibly incorporating behavioral response patterns. In the proposed modeling framework, behavioral patterns of animals are reflected by specifying desirable constraints among conditional probabilities used to parameterize overall probabilities of different capture histories. We explicitly introduce various sets of crucial constraints which encode interpretable assumptions of behavioral patterns and lead to a unique estimate of the animal population size. Bias corrections and Bayesian credible intervals previously designed for disease surveillance are adapted to accommodate sparse CRC data which are commonly encountered in ecological studies. The proposed method incorporating minimal constraints is demonstrated to provide comparatively robust estimates in real data applications and simulation studies. To improve estimation when data are sparse, we also illustrate the use of Akaike's information criterion (AIC) to potentially justify additional noncrucial modeling constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.