ReviewCanadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR2025
Status of tobacco and electronic nicotine delivery systems use among health science students in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review.
Review in Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Status of tobacco and electronic nicotine delivery systems use among health science students in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review.Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The prevalence of tobacco use is high among health science students in low- and middle-income countries. This population participates in tobacco and nicotine delivery systems prevention strategies. We sought to determine the status of tobacco and nicotine delivery systems used among health sciences students in low- and middle-income countries. Methods: A scoping review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We included original research articles published in the last 10 years in indexed journals, written in Spanish and English, that focused on populations of healthcare students in low- and middle-income countries and provided information on the use of tobacco or nicotine delivery systems. Eleven databases were searched, and data were extracted using inductive analysis and thematic synthesis. Results: Thirty-four articles were reviewed. Asia was the continent that produced the most literature on the subject, and most studies had a quantitative cross-sectional methodological design. Information on social and cultural issues related to drug use, mental health, healthcare, smoking cessation, and policies and programs is presented in narrative form. Conclusions: Little information exists about the social and cultural aspects associated with the use of nicotine delivery systems, and the needs of health science students in this regard. This issue requires research through participatory, qualitative, or mixed-method approaches, focusing on analyzing participants' needs and identifying ways to transform their reality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.