Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40851423›Full record

SynthesisScandinavian journal of caring sciences2025

Inner Strength-A Systematic Review of Qualitative Empirical Studies.

Astrid Norberg, Gunilla Strandberg

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Inner Strength-A Systematic Review of Qualitative Empirical Studies.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Astrid NorbergEmerita, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Gunilla StrandbergEmerita, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7005-3760

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis review focuses on the use of the term inner strength (IS) in empirical studies in a health care context.

methodAfter database searches during the period 1990-2024, 64 articles were selected for summative content analysis.

resultThe findings were divided into three groups: Group 1, studies where IS was stated in the aim; Group 2, where IS was not stated in the aim but described as a concept; and Group 3, where IS was used as a lay term. All articles in Group 1 described IS as 'A connectedness grown in relationship'; several articles described it as 'An internal powerful resource', 'A process of growth and transition' and as 'A positive view of life'. These four themes were also found in Group 2, but in this group, IS was also used to describe 'A characteristic of self' and 'A courage to stand up for oneself'. The articles in Group 1 and Group 2 seemed to use IS as a cluster concept, that is, various descriptions might be aspects of a common phenomenon. In Group 3, IS was used as a lay term without further reflection on the meaning of the term.

conclusionThe use of the term IS indicates that it is a cluster concept involving several aspects. Overall it is described as an important inner resource grown in connectedness with others and developed throughout life in a life worth living.

Indexed as

AdultEmpirical ResearchFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchconceptinner strengthinternal resourceslay termliterature reviewqualitative approachrelationship

Identifiers

PMID40851423
PMCPMC12375945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.