ReviewRomanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
Appendiceal malakoplakia: a review of the literature and case presentation.
Review in Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Malakoplakia in Immunocompromised Hosts: A Case Series and Literature Review.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Impact of Disease Severity and Age on Outcomes After Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Enteroenteric Fistula Following Multiple Magnet Ingestion in an Adult: Case Report, Literature Review and Management Algorithm.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background∕Objectives: Malakoplakia is an uncommon clinicopathological entity defined by the accumulation of dysfunctional macrophages containing undigested bacterial remnants and pathognomonic Michaelis-Gutmann bodies. Although it most frequently involves the gastrointestinal tract, particularly the colon, rectum, and rectosigmoid junction, appendiceal involvement remains rare. This case represents only the fourth reported occurrence of appendiceal malakoplakia in a young, immunocompetent adult without notable comorbidities, underscoring its exceptional clinical presentation. Study selection for review: A PubMed search was performed to explore the current understanding of malakoplakia, with emphasis on its etiopathogenesis, diagnostic criteria, and therapeutic strategies. Case presentation: A 25-year-old immunocompetent male presented with a periappendicular abscess mimicking a tumor, ultimately requiring right hemicolectomy. Histopathological (HP) evaluation confirmed intestinal-appendicular malakoplakia and granulomatous lymphadenitis, with no evidence of tuberculosis, underscoring the diagnostic challenge and the need for further investigation into its etiopathogenesis in young, otherwise healthy individuals. Conclusions: This case illustrates a rare instance of appendicular malakoplakia in a young adult, emphasizing the importance of HP evaluation for accurate diagnosis and the need to consider this entity in the differential diagnosis of appendiceal masses to avoid mismanagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.