Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40851211›Full record

ArticleCurrent topics in medicinal chemistry2026

UPLC-LCMS-Based Method Development, Validation, Forced Degradation, and Impurity Profiling of Nirogacestat Drug Substance.

S R Thrinath, Manikandan Krishnan, K S Lakshmi, Sharad D Mankumare

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current topics in medicinal chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S R ThrinathDepartment of Pharmaceutical Analysis, SRM College of Pharmacy, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur - 603203, Tamil Nadu, India.
Manikandan KrishnanDepartment of Pharmaceutical Analysis, SRM College of Pharmacy, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur - 603203, Tamil Nadu, India.
K S LakshmiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Analysis, SRM College of Pharmacy, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur - 603203, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sharad D MankumareUnited States Pharmacopeia, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study aims to establish a novel, straightforward, and reliable UPLCMS method for determining the stability and impurity profile of Nirogacestat under various stress conditions, in accordance with ICH guidelines. The stability of Nirogacestat was investigated under various stress conditions, including acid/base hydrolysis, oxidation (H2O2), photolysis, reduction, and thermal degradation. This research addresses the need for a validated, stability-indicating method that performs reliably across key analytical parameters, thereby contributing to pharmaceutical quality assurance. MATERIALS AND

methodsStress testing was performed by exposing Nirogacestat to various degradation conditions, including acid (0.1 and 1N HCl), base (NaOH), oxidative (30% H₂O₂), thermal (105°C), photolytic, and reductive environments. The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile and 0.1% triethylamine/formic acid, adjusted to pH 2.5 in a 30:70 (v/v) ratio. Chromatographic separation was achieved using an Acquity UPLC BEH Shield RP-18 column (50 × 1.0 mm, 1.7 μ m), with a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min and detection at 251 nm. Linearity was evaluated over a concentration range of 0.25 to 1.5 μg/mL. Validation studies assessed parameters such as selectivity, linearity, accuracy, precision, robustness, and solution stability.

resultsThe method demonstrated excellent linearity (r² = 0.999), with peak area directly proportional to concentration within the studied range. All validation parameters were within acceptable limits. Forced degradation studies revealed distinct degradation products under each stress condition. Notably, alkaline degradation resulted in the least degradation, while acid, peroxide, photolytic, thermal, and reductive conditions produced a variety of degradation products. These were effectively separated from Nirogacestat using the developed method. The relative retention times for Nirogacestat and its impurities remained consistent, and mass spectrometry confirmed the identities of the degradation products. DISCUSSION: The validated UPLC-MS method exhibited high sensitivity, selectivity, and robustness in detecting Nirogacestat and its impurities. It effectively distinguishes degradation products even within complex matrices and fully complies with ICH guidelines for analytical method validation. The degradation profile of Nirogacestat under various stress conditions provides critical insights into its stability behavior, which is essential for formulation development and regulatory compliance. The successful separation and identification of degradation products further underscore the method's applicability as a stability-indicating assay.

conclusionThe developed UPLC-MS method is the first validated stability-indicating technique for Nirogacestat, offering comprehensive impurity profiling. It is precise, accurate, linear, and robust, making it highly suitable for routine quality control and regulatory submission. This method enables the reliable detection of degradation products, thereby enhancing the safety and efficacy profile of Nirogacestat in pharmaceutical preparations.

Indexed as

Drug ContaminationBulk DrugsChromatography, High Pressure LiquidDrug StabilityHydrolysisLiquid Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryOxidation-ReductionBulk DrugsForced Degradation StudiesImpurity ProfilingMethod Validation.NirogacestatStability-Indicating AssayUPLC-LCMS Method

Identifiers

PMID40851211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.