Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40851205›Full record

ArticleWomen's health (London, England)

Provider-reliant contraception use among reproductive-aged women in rural Appalachian Ohio.

Kayla M Alvis, Mikaela H Smith, Abigail Norris Turner, Maria F Gallo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kayla M AlvisSchool of Environment and Natural Resources, College of Food, Agricultural, and Environmental Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-3396-0122
Mikaela H SmithDivision of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Abigail Norris TurnerDivision of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Maria F GalloDepartment of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.

Funding

Institute for Population ResearchP2CHD058484 · NICHD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HAYFORD, SARAH R · 2014 to 2023
$5.0M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD058484
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile rural Appalachian adults tend to experience poorer reproductive health and more social drivers of poor health compared to other populations, data on contraception use in rural Appalachia are lacking.

objectiveWe aimed to analyze the relationship between rural Appalachian residence and contraception use, focusing on methods that require a provider to access.

designThe study used a population-representative cross-sectional survey.

methodsWe analyzed 2018-2019 cross-sectional data from the Ohio Survey of Women (n = 2568), a population-representative survey of women aged 18-44 years in Ohio. Our outcome was provider-reliant contraception, defined as methods requiring either a prescription or a procedure performed by a healthcare provider. Key independent variables included residence (rural Appalachian versus other regions), disruptive life events (e.g. family or friend's death, unemployment), and difficulty accessing health care.

resultsAmong rural Appalachian reproductive-age women at risk of unintended pregnancy in Ohio, 71% used provider-reliant contraception compared to 64% of those elsewhere in the state (p = 0.02). A higher proportion of rural Appalachian women used provider-reliant contraception in models adjusting for demographic factors and medical care access (odds ratio: 1.43, 95% confidence interval: 1.04-1.97). This difference did not remain after adjusting for disruptive life events. When women with permanent contraception were excluded from the analytic sample, we observed no differences in provider-reliant contraceptive use by residence.

conclusionsWe found statistically significant differences in provider-reliant contraception by rural Appalachian residence in most analyses, but these disappeared when those with female permanent contraception were excluded. Observed differences in the full sample appear to be driven by higher use of permanent contraception among rural Appalachian women.

Indexed as

ContraceptionContraception BehaviorHealth Services AccessibilityRural PopulationAdolescentAdultAppalachian RegionCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansOhioPregnancyPregnancy, UnplannedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAppalachiacontraceptionreproductive health

Identifiers

PMID40851205
PMCPMC12375852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.