Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40851188›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society2025

C-REGS2-A multinational, high-quality comparative effectiveness study of Cerebrolysin in moderate acute ischemic stroke.

Milan R Vosko, Daniel Sanak, Youngrok Do, Jarungchai S Vatanagul, Tamer Roushdy, Natan M Bornstein, Johannes C Vester, Michael Brainin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Milan R VoskoDepartment of Neurology, Kepler University Hospital, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-3270-3459
Daniel SanakDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Youngrok DoDepartment of Neurology, Daegu Catholic University Medical Center, Daegu, South Korea.
Jarungchai S VatanagulDepartment of Internal Medicine, Perpetual Succour Hospital, Cebu City, Philippines.ORCID 0009-0003-1693-3534
Tamer RoushdyDepartment of Neurology, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Natan M BornsteinDepartment of Neurology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-4442-8637
Johannes C VesterDepartment of Biometry and Clinical Research, IDV Data Analysis and Study Planning, Gauting, Germany.
Michael BraininDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences and Preventive Medicine, Danube University Krems, Krems, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8363-4962

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe main objective of the Cerebrolysin REGistry Study in Stroke 2 (C-REGS2) was to systematically record the routine clinical use of Cerebrolysin in patients with moderate ischemic stroke (IS) following the principles of a prospective controlled effectiveness study (CES) to compare its effectiveness in terms of functional recovery to patients treated with standard therapy alone.

methodsC-REGS2 used an open-label, prospective controlled comparative effectiveness design aligning with the Target Trial Emulation Framework (TTEF) and the GRACE principles for high-quality observational studies based on the principles of high-quality comparative effectiveness research (HQCER) to capture treatment effects in clinical practice. The study was conducted in 16 countries worldwide between April 2018 and April 2024. Moderate IS was defined as baseline NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score 8-15. Treatment modalities and concomitant medications were according to local standards. The methodology included rigorous pre-specified analysis and tight risk-based centralized monitoring, to ensure minimal enrollment bias, maximize data quality and overall reliability of trial results. The compared patient groups were standardized using a restricted cohort design and non-parametric multilevel stratification following the Good Research for Comparative Effectiveness (GRACE) principles. The primary endpoint was ordinal analysis of the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days after stroke onset. Secondary endpoints were the ordinal NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at day 21 and 90 after stroke onset, the ordinal mRS at 21 days after IS, the proportion of patients with excellent recovery (mRS 0-1) as well as the proportion of patients with functional independence (mRS 0-2) at 90 days after stroke onset and the ordinal analysis of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scale at 90 days after IS.

resultsOut of 1865 enrolled patients, the target population (TP) comprised 1769 patients (1021 Cerebrolysin-treated and 748 controls). The median NIHSS at baseline was 10.0. Median Cerebrolysin dose was 30 ml, median treatment duration was 10 days. Cerebrolysin was superior to standard therapy in the primary endpoint independently to prior thrombolysis (MW 0.6157; confidence interval (CI) 0.5910-0.6404; P < 0.0001) as well as in all secondary endpoints: mRS at day 21 (MW 0.6065, 95% CI 0.5811-0.6319, P < 0.0001), NIHSS at day 21 (MW 0.5792; 95% CI 0.5576-0.6008; P < 0.0001) and NIHSS at day 90 (MW 0.5781; CI 0.5561-0.6002; P < 0.0001). Additional pre-specified secondary endpoints (proportion of patients with excellent recovery and functional independence) showed moderate superiority for Cerebrolysin. The ordinal MoCA showed superiority for Cerebrolysin in the TP (MW 0.5530; CI 0.5282-0.5778; P < 0.0001) with more pronounced effects in the subgroup with cognitive impairments at baseline (Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) ⩾ 3.3). No differences in safety measures were recorded. The study is notable for its robust data integrity, with valid entries of 90.9% for the primary 90 day mRS assessment with multilevel case mix standardization and an overall dropout rate to the final visit of only 5.7%.

conclusionThe results of the C-REGS2 study showed the effectiveness and safety of Cerebrolysin treatment for moderate acute IS in real-world clinical practice.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsIschemic StrokeNeuroprotective AgentsAgedComparative Effectiveness ResearchFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRecovery of FunctionRegistriesTreatment OutcomeAmino AcidscerebrolysinNeuroprotective Agentsacute ischemic strokeCerebrolysinfunctional outcomeGRACEhigh quality comparative effectiveness researchHQCER

Identifiers

PMID40851188
PMCPMC12589672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.