ReviewAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2025
Ocular changes as potential biomarkers for early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease.
Review in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retinal Layer Changes With Aging and Cognitive Decline in Rhesus Macaques.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Seeing Through Feeling: Dynamic Interplay Between Emotion and Visual Perception.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Brain-body interactions in systemic diseases: a survey from an imaging perspective.MedScience · 2026Review
- Plaque-associated Microglial Polarization in Visual Brain Regions of the 5xFAD Mouse Model.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Plaque-associated microglial polarization in visual brain regions of the 5xFAD mouse model.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Ocular changes as potential biomarkers for early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder and the most common cause of dementia. AD diagnosis often involves a thorough assessment, including clinical evaluation, cognitive testing, medical history examination, genetic testing, and biomarker analysis. Currently, the invasive nature and high costs of biomarker testing, such as cerebrospinal fluid analysis and neuroimaging, have limited the early detection and intervention of the disease. Therefore, researchers have explored cheaper and less invasive options, such as ocular imaging. This review discusses the close relationship between the eye and the central nervous system and ocular changes as a potential non-invasive AD biomarker. Ocular changes in AD have frequently been reported in the literature, particularly in the later stages of the disease. However, identifying biomarkers specifically attributable to AD remains a challenge. Additionally, this review provides a comprehensive overview of existing studies and highlights potential pathways for enhancing AD detection through ocular structural and functional evaluation. HIGHLIGHTS: Widespread screening for early detection of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is limited by cost and time constraints with current methods. Non-invasive and inexpensive methods are needed to overcome these difficulties. The eye is readily accessible and has shared developmental origins, neurobiology, and neurochemistry with the brain. The expanding field of ocular biomarker studies needs larger, well-characterized cohorts and longitudinal studies to understand the ocular changes for preclinical AD screening. Standards should be established for more methodical investigative approaches to identify ocular biomarkers that are specifically attributable to AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.