Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40851067›Full record

ArticleNPJ science of food2025

Consumer sensory preferences for processed meats with synthetic, conventional, organic, and deodorized curing ingredients.

Siyuan Sheng, Erin M Silva, Steven C Ricke, James R Claus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ science of food, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Siyuan ShengDepartment of Animal & Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA. siyuan.sheng@outlook.com.
Erin M SilvaDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
Steven C RickeDepartment of Animal & Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
James R ClausDepartment of Animal & Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA. jrclaus@wisc.edu.

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2019-51300-30243
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The perceived environmental sustainability of organic food products is often offset by consumer sensory preferences, yet a quantitative understanding of these preferences remains elusive. We evaluated how consumer sensory perception of processed meats is influenced by different curing ingredient types. We found from a three-year longitudinal sensory panel analysis of non-incentivized consumers' opinions on widely consumed processed meats that retronasal aroma, specifically non-meat aftertastes, critically determines consumer purchase intent between organic and conventional formulations.

Identifiers

PMID40851067
PMCPMC12375696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.