Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40851058›Full record

ReviewEJNMMI reports2025

Molecular imaging techniques in patients with persistent spinal pain syndrome type 2 - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lara S Burmeister, Richard L Witkam, Kris C P Vissers, Martin Gotthardt, Dylan J H A Henssen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EJNMMI reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lara S BurmeisterDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, 6525 GA, The Netherlands. Lara.Burmeister@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-6463-959X
Richard L WitkamDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1110-840X
Kris C P VissersDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2919-6356
Martin GotthardtDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, 6525 GA, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6537-7744
Dylan J H A HenssenDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, 6525 GA, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3915-3034

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersistent postoperative low back pain, including persistent spinal pain syndrome type 2 (PSPS-T2), is a global healthcare challenge that lacks objective phenotypic diagnostic criteria or validated biomarkers. Molecular imaging techniques (nuclear medicine) could aid in establishing more objective phenotypical parameters as they are able to visualize biological processes underlying several diseases even before anatomical changes are present. This review aims to provide an overview of the status quo of molecular imaging for the diagnosis of PSPS-T2. METHOD AND

resultsAn extensive search of PubMed and Embase was conducted to identify relevant studies that comprise imaging techniques using a radiopharmaceutical substance. Evidence reveals that these techniques can provide valuable insights into the underlying pathologies and mechanisms of PSPS-T2 by detecting pain generators that would have otherwise gone unnoticed. Moreover, the meta-analysis showed a pooled sensitivity of 90.3% (95% CI: 53–100%) and a specificity of 89.1% (95% CI: 31–100%) for [18F]NaF PET-CT, and a pooled sensitivity of 61.5% (95% CI: 7–93%) and specificity of 96% (95% CI: 21–100%) for diphosphonates SPECT-CT.

conclusionThese findings suggest a potential utility in identifying those who are likely to benefit from surgical re-intervention. This illustrates the potential of molecular imaging in establishing a personalized-medicine approach. However, the retrospective design and the limited sample sizes are among the limitations of the included studies and further research is needed to unravel the potential of molecular imaging techniques as a tool to detect phenotypical biomarkers and to optimize patient care in patients with persistent postoperative low back pain, including PSPS-T2.

Indexed as

Back painChronic painMolecular imagingNuclear imagingPersistent spinal pain syndrome type 2post-surgical pain

Identifiers

PMID40851058
PMCPMC12375521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.