ReviewEJNMMI reports2025
Molecular imaging techniques in patients with persistent spinal pain syndrome type 2 - a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in EJNMMI reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structural and Functional Treatment of Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type 2: A Fibrosis-Stratified Network Meta-Analysis of Epidural Adhesiolysis and Neuromodulation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPersistent postoperative low back pain, including persistent spinal pain syndrome type 2 (PSPS-T2), is a global healthcare challenge that lacks objective phenotypic diagnostic criteria or validated biomarkers. Molecular imaging techniques (nuclear medicine) could aid in establishing more objective phenotypical parameters as they are able to visualize biological processes underlying several diseases even before anatomical changes are present. This review aims to provide an overview of the status quo of molecular imaging for the diagnosis of PSPS-T2. METHOD AND
resultsAn extensive search of PubMed and Embase was conducted to identify relevant studies that comprise imaging techniques using a radiopharmaceutical substance. Evidence reveals that these techniques can provide valuable insights into the underlying pathologies and mechanisms of PSPS-T2 by detecting pain generators that would have otherwise gone unnoticed. Moreover, the meta-analysis showed a pooled sensitivity of 90.3% (95% CI: 53–100%) and a specificity of 89.1% (95% CI: 31–100%) for [18F]NaF PET-CT, and a pooled sensitivity of 61.5% (95% CI: 7–93%) and specificity of 96% (95% CI: 21–100%) for diphosphonates SPECT-CT.
conclusionThese findings suggest a potential utility in identifying those who are likely to benefit from surgical re-intervention. This illustrates the potential of molecular imaging in establishing a personalized-medicine approach. However, the retrospective design and the limited sample sizes are among the limitations of the included studies and further research is needed to unravel the potential of molecular imaging techniques as a tool to detect phenotypical biomarkers and to optimize patient care in patients with persistent postoperative low back pain, including PSPS-T2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.