ArticleBrain topography2025
Development of the Hand Knob Position in the 10-20 System for a More Accurate Identification of the M1-HAND.
Article in Brain topography, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The international 10-20 system's C3/C4 positions are standard for locating the primary motor hand area (M1-HAND) in tDCS and as TMS motor mapping references. While cost-effective, their accuracy for M1-HAND localization is limited as compared to specialized methods. This study aimed to establish a novel position within the 10-20 system for accurately identifying the anatomical hand knob, thereby providing an accurate indirect reference for the M1-HAND. We analyzed 116 MRI scans to define standardized X and Y coordinates representing the scalp projection of the anatomical hand knob. These coordinates were converted into percentages (X% and Y%) based on the nasion-inion and tragus-to-tragus distances, respectively. Initial testing revealed X% didn't improve accuracy and thus was excluded. However, Y% (13% of the tragus-to-tragus distance) significantly enhanced targeting by shifting the optimal site medially relative to C3/C4 placements. We then evaluated the accuracy of this new position against C1/C2, C3h/C4h, and C3/C4. While X coordinates of the corresponding anatomical area of the hand knob on the scalp and C3/C4 positions were similar, their Y coordinates differed significantly. The new position (hand knob position) demonstrated the closest proximity to the anatomical hand knob area on the scalp among all evaluated positions. Our study establishes an accurate position within the 10-20 system for identifying the corresponding anatomical area on the scalp of the hand knob. The Y% value (13% of tragus-to-tragus distance) notably enhances the specificity of M1-HAND localization (via its anatomical correlate) as compared to traditional 10-20 system positions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40850992What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.