ArticleScientific reports2025
Predicting water quality index using stacked ensemble regression and SHAP based explainable artificial intelligence.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable Stacked Ensemble Learning for Predicting Antibiotic Residues in the Danube River Within the Territory of the City of Novi Sad, Serbia.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Metaheuristic-optimized interaction-aware deep learning with large language model assistance for data-driven water quality prediction.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Seasonal water quality index prediction in Guilin karst water system: an explainable machine learning approach.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comparative assessment of machine learning models for polymer solution viscosity prediction in enhanced oil recovery.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effective forecasting of the Water Quality Index (WQI) considerably impacts water resource management as well as public health safety. This study proposes a new approach for WQI forecasting using stacked regression ensemble modeling integrated with SHAP (Shapley Additive explanations), a form of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). The model was developed using a dataset of 1,987 water quality samples from Indian rivers (2005-2014), processed through six optimized machine learning algorithms: XGBoost, CatBoost, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Extra Trees, and AdaBoost, combined using Linear Regression as the meta-learner. The model was trained using seven normalized physicochemical parameters as predictors, and the computed WQI (via the weighted arithmetic method) served as the response variable. The stacked ensemble model outperformed all individual models, achieving the highest performance across all evaluation metrics, with R² reaching 0.9952, Adjusted R² at 0.9947, MAE recorded at 0.7637, and RMSE reduced to 1.0704. Among the individual models, CatBoost and Gradient Boosting demonstrated the strongest standalone performance. CatBoost achieved an R² of 0.9894, Adjusted R² at 0.9883 MAE of 0.8399, and RMSE of 1.5905, while Gradient Boosting attained an R² of 0.9907, Adjusted R² at 0.9898 MAE of 1.0759, and RMSE of 1.4898, respectively. SHAP analysis revealed that DO, BOD, conductivity, and pH were the most influential parameters contributing to the prediction of WQI. This integrated framework improves existing approaches by providing high predictive accuracy and model interpretability along with real-time environmental monitoring capabilities. It fosters anticipatory environmental surveillance, automated policy frameworks, and confidence among stakeholders regarding the sustainability of water resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.