Trial reportScientific reports2025
A comparative 48 month randomized trial of clinical performance and wear of BISGMA based and BISGMA free nanoceramic resin composites.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04738604 (Clinical Performance and Wear Resistance of Two Nano Ceramic Resin Composite in Class I Cavities), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical Performance and Wear Resistance of Two Nano Ceramic Resin Composite in Class I Cavities: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effect of fiber bundle posts used with different core materials on fracture resistance: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Effect of sugar and sweetener on the bleachability of coffee and tea-induced stains on composites: an in vitro experimental study.Restorative dentistry & endodontics · 2026Article
- Wear resistance, microhardness and compressive strength of high filled flowable composite resins.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the 48-month clinical performance and wear of Bis-GMA-based and Bis-GMA-free nanoceramic resin composites in Class I posterior restorations. In a randomized clinical trial, 64 patients received occlusal restorations with either Zenit (Bis-GMA-based) or Neo Spectra ST (Bis-GMA-free) nanoceramic composites (n = 32). Clinical performance was evaluated using modified USPHS criteria at four timepoints (baseline, 12, 24, 48 months). Intraoral scans were analyzed using 3D digital superimposition techniques to assess linear and volumetric quantification of wear across follow-up periods. The results revealed that marginal discoloration was slightly more frequent in the Zenit group at 48 months, though not statistically significant. Clinical outcomes were comparable between groups. The amount of linear deviation measured in Zenit samples was higher than in Neo Spectra, whereas the volumetric deviation was greater in Neo Spectra. However, neither difference was statistically significant. Both composites demonstrated clinically acceptable performance over a 48-month period in Class I posterior restorations. Some marginal discoloration was observed with both materials. The differing matrix-to-filler ratios of the two nanoceramic resin composites may have contributed to compensating for volumetric wear. Intraoral scanning and digital analysis enable accurate, non-invasive wear monitoring. Neo Spectra ST offers superior esthetic stability and clinical handling. Neo Spectra™ ST may offer a clinically advantageous option for posterior restorations requiring esthetic durability and operator-friendly handling. Additionally, digital intraoral scanning combined with registration software provides a promising, non-invasive approach for monitoring restorative wear in clinical practice.Clinical trial registration: This study was registered on clinical trial ( http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov ) at February 4, 2021 with ID: NCT04738604.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.