ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and validation of a machine learning-based survival prediction model for Asian glioblastoma patients using the SEER database and Chinese data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glioblastoma is an aggressive, malignant primary brain tumour and the most prevalent histological type of glioma. Our study attempted to investigate the independent predictors of overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in Asian patients with glioblastoma and establish predictive models for the OS and CSS of Asian patients with glioblastoma based on the machine learning algorithms. Data from Asian patients with glioblastoma in the SEER database were retrieved and stochastically grouped into a training set (n = 845) and a validation set (n = 362), and patients in our centre were assigned to the test set (n = 172). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the prognostic factors. Predictive models for OS and CSS were established based on eight machine learning algorithms, including Lasso Cox, random survival forest, CoxBoost, generalized boosted regression modelling (GBM), stepwise Cox and survival support vector machine, eXtreme Gradient Boosting, supervised principal component and partial least squares regression for Cox, and the selected predictive models were evaluated by the area under the ROC curves (AUC) and 95% confidence interval (CI), calibration curves and decision curve analyses in the training set, validation set and test set. In our retrospective study, age, tumour history, histologic type, surgery and chemotherapy were confirmed to be predictors of OS (p < 0.05); age, tumour history, histologic type, surgery and chemotherapy were identified as independent factors for CSS (p < 0.05). The predictive model for OS based on the GBM algorithm exhibited excellent predictive performance at 6 months (AUC = 0.837, 95% CI: 0.803-0.870), 12 months (AUC = 0.809, 95% CI: 0.780-0.839) and 24 months (AUC = 0.750, 95% CI: 0.717-0.783) in the training set, and the powerful predictive performance of the GBM model was confirmed in the validation and test sets, with good concordance between the predicted and observed OS rates demonstrated by calibration curves and clinical decision making performance suggested by the decision curve analyses curves. The predictive model based on the GBM algorithm for CSS also performed best = in the training set at 6 months (AUC = 0.808, 95% CI: 0.770-0.847), 12 months (AUC = 0.755, 95% CI: 0.721-0.789) and 24 months (AUC = 0.692, 95% CI: 0.657-0.728) in the training set, and convincing predictive effectiveness was also confirmed in the validation and test sets with good calibration and clinical utility. Age, tumour history, histologic type, surgery and chemotherapy were confirmed to be independent factors for OS; and age, tumour history, histologic type, surgery and chemotherapy were identified as prognostic factors for CSS in our retrospective study. The predictive model constructed for OS and CSS based on the GBM algorithm in Asian patients with glioblastoma can be used to accurately predict OS and CSS in clinical practice, which may help tailor personalized treatment regimens and provide significant benefits for these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.