Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40850961›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Deep dictionary learning with reconstruction for texture recognition.

Pengwen Xiong, Ke Zhang, Zhi Shi, MengChu Zhou, Aiguo Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pengwen XiongSchool of Advanced Manufacturing, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330031, China. steven.xpw@ncu.edu.cn.
Ke ZhangSchool of Advanced Manufacturing, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330031, China.
Zhi ShiSchool of Advanced Manufacturing, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330031, China.
MengChu ZhouHelen and John C. Hartmann Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, 07102, USA.
Aiguo SongSchool of Instrument Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210096, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 62373181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Texture recognition underpins critical applications in industrial quality control, robotic manipulation, and biomedical imaging. Traditional deep dictionary learning methods for texture recognition often emphasize deep feature extraction. However, they tend to lose crucial features as model depth increases, which can reduce their overall effectiveness. To address this issue, we propose a dictionary-reconstruction-based deep learning approach by incorporating a novel hybrid fusion method designed to enhance the accuracy of texture recognition. Our approach involves the successive fusion of multimodality and multi-level features. By reconstructing dictionaries learned at different levels, we integrate both deep and intuitive features. Additionally, we introduce a grouping optimization technique, based on single-sample learning, to train these reconstructed dictionaries, thereby improving feature learning and training efficiency. The proposed approach fuses feature data from various multimodal sources and constructs dictionaries at different learning levels, which enables effective feature fusion across these levels. We evaluate our approach against recent deep learning methods by using the LMT-108 and SpectroVision datasets. The results demonstrate its 97.7% and 89.4% accuracy rates, respectively, outperforming its peers and validating its robustness when handling diverse and challenging data.

Indexed as

Deep dictionary learningDictionary reconstructionFeature fusionTexture recognition

Identifiers

PMID40850961
PMCPMC12375791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.