ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2025
Needs and experiences of families after a sudden unexplained death in childhood: a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSudden unexplained death in childhood (SUDC) is a rare and devastating experience for families. In the UK, multi-agency investigation by police, health and social care of sudden, unexpected child deaths is a statutory requirement aiming to identify full causes for deaths. Families should be allocated bereavement keyworkers for support throughout the investigative process which can take several months. Previous research has focused on multi-agency investigation of sudden infant deaths, with little known about parents' experiences for deaths of older children.
methodsBereaved parents of children in the UK, aged 1 to 17 years who died from SUDC during 2018-2022, were recruited through SUDC-UK charity and their mailing list and word of mouth. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in 2023. Interview transcripts underwent thematic analysis.
resultsInterviews were conducted with parents from 20 families across England, Scotland and Northern Ireland in 2023. Four key themes were identified: the importance of keyworkers, trauma-informed communication, proactivity from professionals and provision of medical screening for families. Keyworkers were valued by parents, but only 12/20 families had keyworkers allocated. Communication and language were important; families were often distressed by unexpected telephone calls particularly relating to post-mortem results. Parents felt they had to be proactive explaining about SUDC to professionals who lacked knowledge of the condition. Parents wanted medical screening to be proactively offered for their families.
conclusionsEvery family must receive swift, proactive, knowledgeable communication from professionals, during and beyond the investigation into their child's sudden unexpected death. This will help them through the process and mitigate the impact of poor communication on their grief. While all parents expressed that they wanted to find out why their child died, they also identified key improvements to the consistency and effectiveness of the investigation process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.