ReviewSeminars in nephrology2025
Regenerative Versus Nonregenerative Repair of the Renal Medulla After Reversal of Ureteral Obstruction.
Review in Seminars in nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many patients with urinary obstruction have an accelerated decline in renal function despite early urologic interventions. They also have defects in urinary concentrating capacity that may predispose them to acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease. Because urinary concentrating capacity depends on having intact solute concentrating mechanisms in the renal medulla, it is likely that this results from obstruction-induced abnormalities in renal medullary structure, function, or both. This review focuses on findings from a recent study characterizing the long-term effects of reversible unilateral ureteral obstruction in mice that address these questions. These findings show that there is delayed long-term growth of the inner medulla, which is initially shrunken, that results in complete restoration of inner medullary size and gross tissue architecture 3 months after reversal of the obstruction. More detailed analysis shows that despite relatively normal histologic appearances, there are permanent defects in the cellular organization and function of the medulla that account for the loss of urinary concentrating capacity. We discuss the extent to which regenerative versus nonregenerative repair mechanisms may contribute to the growth and functional recovery of the renal medulla and consider how these findings shed light on the mechanisms of tissue repair and dysfunction after reversal of urinary obstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.