Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40850740›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical genetics2025

Reproductive carrier screening for genetic disorders: position statement of the Canadian College of Medical Geneticists.

Ritu B Aul, Karen Elizabeth Canales, Isabelle De Bie, Anne-Marie Laberge, Sylvie Langlois, Tanya N Nelson, Sakina Walji, Andrea C Yu, Joanna Lazier, Canadian College of Medical Geneticists and 1 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The clinical utility of carrier screening.NPJ genomic medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ritu B AulDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Karen Elizabeth CanalesDivision of Medical Genetics, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-2222-7800
Isabelle De BieDivision of Medical Genetics, Department of Specialized Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8721-2991
Anne-Marie LabergeDivision of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Sylvie LangloisDepartment of Medical Genetics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Tanya N NelsonDepartment of Medical Genetics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5344-3516
Sakina WaljiDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8680-2028
Andrea C YuDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3684-5112
Joanna LazierDepartment of Medical Genetics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada jlazier@cheo.on.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2709-5049
Canadian College of Medical Geneticists
Canadian College of Medical Geneticists

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose and scopeThe aim of this position statement is to provide recommendations aimed at Canadian reproductive care clinicians and genetics professionals regarding the use of reproductive carrier screening for autosomal recessive and X-linked recessive conditions. METHODS OF STATEMENT DEVELOPMENT: A multidisciplinary expert group was assembled to review the existing literature on reproductive carrier screening for autosomal recessive and X-linked recessive conditions and make recommendations relevant to the Canadian context. The statement was circulated for comment to the membership of the Canadian College of Medical Geneticists (CCMG) and Canadian Association of Genetic Counsellors (CAGC), and multiple family physician reviewers. Feedback from these groups was incorporated, and the final position statement was approved by the CCMG Board of Directors on 5 December 2024 and the CAGC Board of Directors on 14 April 2025. RESULTS AND

conclusionsRoutinely offered pan-ethnic reproductive carrier screening via a provincial or territorial programme is recommended for a limited panel of relatively common and severe childhood onset genetic conditions, based on Canadian experience with ethnicity-based testing: cystic fibrosis, fragile X syndrome, spinal muscular atrophy, haemoglobinopathies and founder mutations for Tay-Sachs disease, Canavan disease and familial dysautonomia. Provincial/territorial programmes must be developed to provide oversight, ensure appropriate resourcing and manage education and roll-out. Maintaining regional ethnicity-based screening programmes is also recommended, where relevant. Publicly funded population-level expanded carrier screening is not recommended at this time.

Indexed as

Genetic Carrier ScreeningGenetic Diseases, InbornGenetic TestingCanadaFemaleGenetic CounselingGenetics, MedicalHumansMaleGenetic Carrier ScreeningGenetic TestingReproductive HealthScreening

Identifiers

PMID40850740
PMCPMC12703332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.