ReviewJournal of advanced research2026
The role of induced resistance in mitigating postharvest fungal diseases in fruits and vegetables.
Review in Journal of advanced research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing Blueberry Postharvest Management: A Paradigm Shift From Pathogen Killing to Niche Occupancy.Journal of food science · 2026Review
- Proteomic analysis of rose apple reveals defense proteins activated during Lasiodiplodia theobromae infection.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026Article
- Slight Water Loss Combined with Methyl Jasmonate Treatment ImprovesFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe process of fruit ripening after harvest renders them susceptible to water loss and disease development by fungal pathogens. Postharvest fungal diseases compromise produce quality and reduce marketable yield, resulting in economic losses and increased food wastage. Fungal disease development is mitigated by plant defense response, fungal pathogenicity factors and control interventions. Induced resistance in harvested fruits has been reported to mitigate disease development by modulating the processes of ripening and senescence, which contributes to the level of host resistance against decay fungi. AIM OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of our current understanding of induced resistance in harvested fruit, and its potential application in the management of postharvest diseases. We hope to provide a scientific information to optimize postharvest practices, improve product quality, prolong shelf-life, and enhance the overall management of harvested and stored produce. KEY SCIENTIFIC CONCEPTS OF REVIEW: Technologies designed to induce host resistance in harvested fruit has been gaining increased interest. This review provides an overview and discussion of recent advances in our understanding of infection mechanisms used by postharvest fungal pathogens, host defense response in harvested produce, and novel ecological, environmental-friendly strategies that enhance host resistance. Existing issues, obstacles and topics of future research are also discussed. Our review highlights the significant scientific and practical potential for the development of methods designed to enhance the resistance of fruit to postharvest pathogens and underscores the need to develop innovative management strategies that mitigate postharvest diseases and their impact on fruit quality, yield, and monetary value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.