ReviewAgeing research reviews2025
Personalized cognitive enhancement for older adults: An aging-friendly closed-loop human-machine interface framework.
Review in Ageing research reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Seamless Human-Computer Interaction Enabled by Wearable Biointerfaces and Intelligent Systems.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A Generative AI Framework for Cognitive Intervention in Older Adults: An Integrated Engineering Design and Clinical Protocol.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Emerging digitally delivered non-pharmacological interventions (dNPIs) offer scalable, low-risk solutions for enhancing cognitive function in older adults, yet their effectiveness remains inconsistent due to a lack of personalization and precise mechanisms of action. Generic, population-based designs often fail to predict individual gains, underscoring the need for more tailored approaches. To address this, we propose a closed-loop human-machine interface (HMI) framework for personalizing dNPIs by optimizing the engagement of neurocognitive resources for cognitive enhancement. Our framework tackles three major challenges: (1) comprehensive and effective neurobehavioral representations for cognitive decoding, (2) tailoring interventions for domain-specific cognitive processes, and (3) ensuring aging-friendly design on usability, validity, and reliability for long-term adherence. We provide reviews and perspectives to guide the development of closed-loop HMIs by outlining the operational details of three key components-sensor, controller, and external actuator-that monitor, analyze, and modulate neurobehavioral activities through real-time adaptive interventions. Centering on neurobehavioral characteristics of older adults, we propose to advance closed-loop HMIs toward (1) deploying multimodal sensor network that captures activities from both central and peripheral nervous systems, (2) artificial intelligence (AI)-powered cognitive decoding and modulation that integrates multi-modal easy-to-acquire neurobehavioral signals and predicts the cross-modal harder-to-acquire signals, and (3) targeting neurobehavioral processes via internal and/or external regulation. We envision that the proposed closed-loop HMI framework could provide personalized dNPI with enhanced effectiveness and scalability for cognitive enhancement in older adults, promoting brain resilience and healthy longevity in the aging population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.