ArticlePediatric surgery international2025
Is prophylactic fundoplication necessary? Laparoscopic fundoplication after gastrostomy vs non-gastrostomy patients.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionLaparoscopic fundoplication is a standard surgical procedure for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). In Japan, it is frequently performed in children with severe motor and intellectual disabilities (SMID), many of whom also require gastrostomy for enteral nutrition. Prophylactic fundoplication during gastrostomy remains controversial due to concerns about post-operative complications and the limited number of patients who subsequently require fundoplication. PATIENTS AND
methodsThis study retrospectively analyzed 47 cases of fundoplication at Tsukuba University Hospital from 2013 to 2024, comparing patients who underwent fundoplication after gastrostomy (post-G group) with those undergoing primary fundoplication (Primary group).
resultsOutcomes including operative time, blood loss, and post-operative hospital stay showed no significant differences between both groups. No cases required open conversion, and post-operative complication rate was not significantly different. DISCUSSION: Our findings indicate that fundoplication can be safely performed after gastrostomy without increased surgical risks, contradicting concerns about adhesions or operative difficulties. Previous studies have also failed to establish a direct link between gastrostomy and GERD progression. Given the low incidence of GERD requiring fundoplication after gastrostomy, routine prophylactic fundoplication is unnecessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40849846What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.