ReviewCurrent Alzheimer research2025
Neuropsychological Aspects of Sporadic Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy: A Case Series and Narrative Review.
Review in Current Alzheimer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCerebral Amyloid Angiopathy (CAA) is a common form of cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD), characterized by the accumulation of amyloid-β (Aβ) protein in the walls of cortical and leptomeningeal arteries and arterioles. The sporadic form primarily affects the elderly and is closely associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Despite previous studies on cognition, the specific neuropsychological profile of CAA remains unclear. This study aims to describe the cognitive profile of CAA patients and characterize their neuropsychological aspects in the absence of a clinical diagnosis of AD.
methodsWe present a case series of six patients with probable CAA, without clinical evidence of AD, who underwent extensive neuropsychological assessment. Additionally, a narrative review was conducted to synthesize current knowledge of the cognitive and neuropsychological aspects of sporadic CAA.
resultsThe narrative review indicates that CAA predominantly affects executive functioning, processing speed, episodic memory, global cognition, and visuospatial functions. In our case series, all patients exhibited impairments in these domains, except for global cognition. Notably, a specific dissociation was observed in the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), with impaired delayed recall but preserved recognition. DISCUSSION: Sporadic CAA in patients without AD contributes to cognitive impairment, particularly affecting executive functioning, processing speed, visuospatial functions, and episodic memory. In our sample, memory impairment in CAA follows a dysexecutive pattern, characterized by retrieval deficits with preserved storage. This contrasts with the amnestic profile seen in AD and amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), where both retrieval and storage are compromised.
conclusionThis distinct memory profile may represent a useful neuropsychological marker for differentiating CAA-related cognitive impairment from that associated with AD and its prodromal forms. This differentiation has potential implications for diagnosis, prognosis, and the development of tailored therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40849758What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.