SynthesisCNS & neurological disorders drug targets2026
Evidence of the Efficacy of Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors in
Synthesis in CNS & neurological disorders drug targets, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis systematic review aimed to provide an updated overview of studies using anticholinesterases with in vivo activity for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
methodsA systematic review was conducted using searches in the following databases: PubMed, SciELO (Scientific Electronic Library Online), Web of Science, LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences), as well as gray literature, through the CAPES and Google Scholar databases of national and international journals. The research was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) platform under registration number: CRD42024482117 and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol.
resultsA total of 1,191 articles were identified in the databases, of which 11 were selected to compose this systematic review, as they met the previously pre-defined selection criteria. The selected articles were published between 2019 and 2023. The substance most commonly used to induce Alzheimer's was scopolamine. As for administration routes, the most used was intraperitoneal. Some of the methods used to evaluate cognitive processes in rats and mice were- Elevated Plus Maze (EPM), Morris water maze (MWZ), Y maze, and passive avoidance tests. DISCUSSION: The reviewed studies demonstrated that the evaluated anticholinesterase agents exhibited anti-Alzheimer activity in animal models, with notable cognitive effects observed in behavioral tests.
conclusionThe data indicated that the analyzed anticholinesterase agents have therapeutic potential for Alzheimer's disease, justifying the continuation of preclinical research and future clinical investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40849753What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.