In one paragraphArticle in BMC pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from itWhat it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
14 authors.
Jung Il KwakDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Asan Medical Center Children's Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9638-3218 Juhee ParkDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Asan Medical Center Children's Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0006-8841-8613 Mi Jin KimDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Asan Medical Center Children's Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9472-3581 Kyusang YooDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Asan Medical Center Children's Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0005-6952-961X Bo Kyeong JinDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Asan Medical Center Children's Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9080-2001 Tae-Gyeong KimDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Asan Medical Center Children's Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5414-8321 Joo Hyung RohDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Asan Medical Center Children's Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0006-7965-4980 Ha Na LeeDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Asan Medical Center Children's Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0217-1773 Keon Hee SeolDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Asan Medical Center Children's Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2563-1699 Chae Young KimDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Asan Medical Center Children's Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9905-6519 Soo Hyun KimDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Asan Medical Center Children's Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5920-7354 Jiyoon JeongDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Asan Medical Center Children's Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3363-1162 Byong Sop LeeDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Asan Medical Center Children's Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1347-4200 Euiseok JungDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Asan Medical Center Children's Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea. euisjung@amc.seoul.kr.ORCID 0000-0003-0693-5627 Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
backgroundCongenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a severe anomaly associated with significant pulmonary hypertension (PH) and high mortality, often requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Early prognostic markers are essential to guide clinical decisions. This study evaluated the prognostic value of right-to-left (R-L) shunting in the patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) during the early postnatal period in predicting ECMO use and mortality in neonates with CDH.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included neonates with CDH admitted between 2013 and 2024. Echocardiographic evaluations within 24 h of birth categorized PDA shunting as left-to-right (L-R), R-L, or bidirectional. Outcomes were analyzed using two models. First, the pure R-L shunt group was compared with the combined L-R and bidirectional shunt groups. Second, bidirectional shunts were subclassified as L-R or R-L predominant based on Doppler spectral area, with the R-L predominant group analyzed together with the pure R-L shunt group and the L-R predominant group analyzed with the L-R shunt group. Primary outcomes were ECMO use or mortality, analyzed using logistic regression.
resultsAmong 145 neonates, both models demonstrated that R-L shunting was associated with a higher ECMO requirement or increased mortality rate compared to L-R shunting (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified R-L shunting as an independent predictor of adverse outcomes (Model 1: odds ratio [OR] 6.785, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.333-19.730; p < 0.001; Model 2: OR 4.067, 95% CI 1.444-11.455; p = 0.008).
conclusionThe direction of early postnatal R-L PDA shunt, assessed within 24 h of birth, was significantly associated with ECMO use or mortality in neonates with CDH.
Indexed as
Ductus Arteriosus, PatentExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationHernias, Diaphragmatic, CongenitalEchocardiographyFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMalePrognosisRetrospective StudiesDiaphragmaticEchocardiographyExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationHerniaMortalityPatent ductus arteriosus
Identifiers
PMID40849638
PMCPMC12374390
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390