ReviewBMC nephrology2025
Belatacept and non-melanoma skin cancer risk in kidney transplant recipients: a narrative review from a mechanistic and clinical perspective.
Review in BMC nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Belatacept in Solid Organ Transplantation: Current Kidney Applications, Future Perspectives in Other Organs, and Clinical Implications.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Onco-nephrology in kidney transplant recipients: challenges and evolving strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-melanoma skin cancer is a prevalent complication in renal transplant recipients due to long-term immunosuppressive therapy. Calcineurin inhibitors, such as tacrolimus and cyclosporine, are effective in preventing graft rejection; however, they significantly increase the risk of non-melanoma skin cancer through broad immunosuppressive and pro-oncogenic mechanisms. Belatacept, a selective co-stimulation blocker targeting the CD80/CD86-CD28 axis, has emerged as a mechanistically distinct alternative with potential benefits for oncologic and renal outcomes. The primary objective of this review is to examine the impact of belatacept-based immunosuppression on the incidence and progression of non-melanoma skin cancer in renal transplant recipients, compared to conventional Calcineurin inhibitors. Secondary objectives include evaluating the immunologic mechanisms underlying its distinct cancer risk profile, exploring combinatory regimens (particularly with mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors), assessing metabolic and nephrotoxic implications, and addressing ethical and clinical considerations in switching stable patients from Calcineurin inhibitors to belatacept. Although retrospective studies suggest a lower incidence of non-melanoma skin cancer with belatacept, robust prospective data remain limited, and its use is associated with increased early rejection and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder risk, particularly in Epstein-Barr virus seronegative patients. Emerging molecular biomarkers and transcriptomic insights may facilitate the development of personalized immunosuppression strategies. Further randomized controlled trials and longitudinal studies are essential to clarify belatacept's oncologic safety and optimize immunosuppressive protocols in high-risk transplant populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.