Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40849615›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2025

AbVLM-Q: intelligent quality assessment for abdominal ultrasound standard planes via vision-language modeling.

Baohua Wang, Yaqian Wang, Yanhua Chu, Ke Zhang, Lei Liu, Kexin Zhang, Bowen Zhu, Dong Wang, Tianan Jiang

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Baohua Wang *Department of Ultrasound Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Yaqian Wang *Yizhun Medical AI Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Yanhua ChuDepartment of Ultrasound Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Ke ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Lei LiuNanchang People's Hospital, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China.
Kexin ZhangYizhun Medical AI Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Bowen ZhuYizhun Medical AI Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Dong WangYizhun Medical AI Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Tianan JiangDepartment of Ultrasound Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China. tiananjiang@zju.edu.cn.

Funding

This study has received funding by the Development Project of National Major Scientific Research Instrument (82027803) 82027803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAbdominal ultrasound is non-invasive and efficient, yet acquiring standard planes remains challenging due to operator dependency and procedural complexity. We propose AbVLM-Q, a vision-language framework for automated quality assessment of abdominal ultrasound standard planes.

methodsIn this study, we assembled a multi-center dataset comprising 7,766 abdominal ultrasound scans, which were randomly divided into training (70%), validation (15%), and testing (15%) subsets. The proposed method, AbVLM-Q, was developed using a three-step approach: (1) hierarchical prompting that incorporates spatially aware querying and sequential reasoning; (2) a quantifiable scoring mechanism based on multi-level clinical penalty criteria; and (3) LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation)-based fine-tuning of a pretrained vision-language model. Performance was evaluated using mean recall, precision, label accuracy, subset accuracy, and confusion matrix analysis.

resultsThe system achieved key structure detection with 88.90% mean recall and 98.10% precision, showing higher precision and comparable recall to Faster R-CNN (89.77% recall, 88.64% precision at a 0.5 confidence threshold). Plane classification yielded 98.96% label accuracy and 96.28% subset accuracy, surpassing the best CNN (97.84%, 94.29%; P < 0.05). Image scoring accuracy for the clinically critical "Excellent" grade (scores 8-10) reached 85.11% with the best-performing backbone. Confusion matrix analysis confirmed consistent performance across different backbones, with discrepancies primarily observed at grade boundaries.

conclusionsAbVLM-Q provides a novel method for automated ultrasound quality assessment, functioning as both an evaluation tool and a training platform for standardized scanning. It bridges AI-driven imaging analysis with clinical workflows, enhancing quality control in ultrasound diagnostics.

Indexed as

AbdomenImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedHumansUltrasonographyAbdominal ultrasoundHierarchical promptingQuality assessmentStandard planeVision-language models

Identifiers

PMID40849615
PMCPMC12374393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.