ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
AbVLM-Q: intelligent quality assessment for abdominal ultrasound standard planes via vision-language modeling.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in assisted localization of fetal ultrasound standard planes: a narrative review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Review
- Medical Vision-Language Models: Existing Technologies, Clinical Applications and Future Directions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-assisted quality assessment of mid-trimester ultrasound examinations using large vision-language models.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAbdominal ultrasound is non-invasive and efficient, yet acquiring standard planes remains challenging due to operator dependency and procedural complexity. We propose AbVLM-Q, a vision-language framework for automated quality assessment of abdominal ultrasound standard planes.
methodsIn this study, we assembled a multi-center dataset comprising 7,766 abdominal ultrasound scans, which were randomly divided into training (70%), validation (15%), and testing (15%) subsets. The proposed method, AbVLM-Q, was developed using a three-step approach: (1) hierarchical prompting that incorporates spatially aware querying and sequential reasoning; (2) a quantifiable scoring mechanism based on multi-level clinical penalty criteria; and (3) LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation)-based fine-tuning of a pretrained vision-language model. Performance was evaluated using mean recall, precision, label accuracy, subset accuracy, and confusion matrix analysis.
resultsThe system achieved key structure detection with 88.90% mean recall and 98.10% precision, showing higher precision and comparable recall to Faster R-CNN (89.77% recall, 88.64% precision at a 0.5 confidence threshold). Plane classification yielded 98.96% label accuracy and 96.28% subset accuracy, surpassing the best CNN (97.84%, 94.29%; P < 0.05). Image scoring accuracy for the clinically critical "Excellent" grade (scores 8-10) reached 85.11% with the best-performing backbone. Confusion matrix analysis confirmed consistent performance across different backbones, with discrepancies primarily observed at grade boundaries.
conclusionsAbVLM-Q provides a novel method for automated ultrasound quality assessment, functioning as both an evaluation tool and a training platform for standardized scanning. It bridges AI-driven imaging analysis with clinical workflows, enhancing quality control in ultrasound diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.