ArticleScientific reports2025
Corneal higher-order aberrations as key predictive indicators of axial elongation in myopic children with orthokeratology: a single-center prospective cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Real-Life Orthokeratology for Myopia Control in Hungarian Children: A Five-Year Study of Axial Length Changes.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This prospective study aimed to investigate changes in corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) in myopic children using orthokeratology (ortho-k) lenses and their relationship with myopia progression. A total of 112 children aged 8-13 years were divided into group A (axial elongation ≤ 0.1 mm/y with ortho-k) and group B (axial elongation > 0.1 mm/y with ortho-k). At baseline, 1, 6, and 12 months following the initiation of lens wear, HOAs and corneal peripheral defocus were evaluated. Ninety-three patients completed the 1-year follow-up. The mean axial elongation was - 0.07 ± 0.15 mm/y in group A, versus 0.32 ± 0.17 mm/y in group B. No statistical differences were observed in HOAs and corneal peripheral defocus at 1, 6, and 12 months (F = 0.653, 0.878; P > 0.05). Multivariate linear regression showed axial elongation was negatively correlated with ∆HOAs, peripheral defocus, and ∆horizontal coma (standardized beta=-0.331, -0.318, -0.209; P = 0.006, 0.001, 0.010, respectively) and positively correlated with the treatment zone diameter (standardized beta = 0.261, P = 0.003). Multivariate logistic regression identified ∆HOAs, peripheral defocus, ∆horizontal coma, and treatment zone as key factors distinguishing group A from group B (OR = 0.009, 0.455, 0.123, 12.172; P = 0.036, 0.003, 0.032, 0.019, respectively). The ROC curve for ∆HOAs had an area of 0.803 with a cut-off value of 0.834 μm. The ∆HOAs were more effective independent predictors of axial elongation than corneal peripheral defocus in children using ortho-k lenses. The ∆HOAs greater than 0.834 μm may lead to axial elongation ≤ 0.1 mm/y. These findings can be beneficial to fitting and optimizing ortho-k lenses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.