ArticleScientific reports2025
Multi-objective particle swarm algorithm based on angular segmentation archive and dynamic update tactics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm with two-stage archive maintenance and auxiliary archive guidance.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- An improved multi-objective animated oat optimization algorithm for resource-constrained construction project organization design.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In multi-objective particle swarm optimization, achieving a balance between solution convergence and diversity remains a crucial challenge. To cope with this difficulty, this paper proposes a novel multi-objective particle swarm algorithm, called ASDMOPSO, which aims to improve the optimization efficiency through the angular division of the archive and the dynamic update strategy. The algorithm efficiently classifies non-dominated solutions by dividing the external archive region into equal angles, thus achieving fine management and diversity maintenance of solutions during the optimization process. When the external archive overflows, the algorithm removes the solution in the highest density region using the congestion distance metric. At the same time, the research presents a multi-stage initialization approach. This method splits the random population into two subpopulations. Subsequently, a genetic algorithm and a differential evolutionary algorithm are utilized for optimization purposes in each subpopulation, respectively. As a result, the quality of the initial population is enhanced. To explore the solution space more efficiently, this paper designs a dynamic flight parameter adjustment technique. This technique balances exploration and exploitation by adjusting the optimization algorithm parameters in real time. The proposed algorithm is compared with several representative multi-objective optimization algorithms on 22 benchmark functions, and statistical tests, sensitivity analysis, and complexity analysis are conducted. The experimental results show that the ASDMOPSO algorithm is more competitive than other comparison algorithms, with significantly improved optimization efficiency. For example, on the ZDT4 test function, its average IGD value is 0.032, outperforming the standard PSO algorithm and surpassing all other comparison algorithms, thereby validating the algorithm's superiority in complex multi-objective optimization problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.