ArticleScientific reports2025
The analysis of landscape design and plant selection under deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An improved YOLOv11n-based method for high-precision detection of ginkgo fruits in complex natural environments.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper explores the application of deep learning (DL) techniques in landscape design and plant selection, aiming to enhance design efficiency and quality through automated plant leaf image recognition (PLIR). A novel framework based on Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Fully Convolutional Network (FCN) is proposed. This framework integrates multi-scale feature fusion, attention mechanisms, and object detection technologies to improve the recognition of landscape elements and the selection of plant leaves. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed DL framework significantly improves performance in landscape element classification tasks. Specifically, the enhanced FCN model achieves a 4.5% improvement in classification accuracy on the Sift Flow dataset, while fine-grained PLIR accuracy increases by 4.8%. Furthermore, the strategy combining object detection and FCN-based image segmentation further boosts accuracy, reaching 90.4% and 88.7%, respectively. These results validate the model's effectiveness in practical simulations, highlighting its innovative contribution to the digitalization and intelligent advancement of landscape design. The key innovation of this paper lies in the first application of multi-scale feature fusion and attention mechanisms within the FCN model, effectively improving the segmentation capability of complex landscape images. Moreover, background noise interference is reduced by using object detection techniques. Additionally, a domain-adaptive transfer learning strategy and region-weighted loss function are designed, further enhancing the model's accuracy and robustness in plant classification tasks. Through the application of these technologies, this paper not only advances the field of landscape design but also provides technical support for biodiversity conservation and sustainable urban planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.