Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40849504›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Adaptive changes in the intestinal microbiota of giant pandas following reintroduction.

Rui Ma, Xiang Yu, Wenlei Bi, Jiabin Liu, Zusheng Li, Rong Hou, Wei Wu, Ping Li, Hui He, Mei Zhang and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Rui MaThe Conservation of Endangered Wildlife Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding, Chengdu, 610000, Sichuan, China.
Xiang YuThe Conservation of Endangered Wildlife Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding, Chengdu, 610000, Sichuan, China.
Wenlei BiThe Conservation of Endangered Wildlife Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding, Chengdu, 610000, Sichuan, China.
Jiabin LiuThe Conservation of Endangered Wildlife Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding, Chengdu, 610000, Sichuan, China.
Zusheng LiThe Conservation of Endangered Wildlife Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding, Chengdu, 610000, Sichuan, China.
Rong HouThe Conservation of Endangered Wildlife Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding, Chengdu, 610000, Sichuan, China.
Wei WuThe Conservation of Endangered Wildlife Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding, Chengdu, 610000, Sichuan, China.
Ping LiAdministration of Daxiangling Nature Reserve, Yaan, 625000, Sichuan, China.
Hui HeAdministration of Daxiangling Nature Reserve, Yaan, 625000, Sichuan, China.
Mei ZhangAdministration of Daxiangling Nature Reserve, Yaan, 625000, Sichuan, China.
Xi YangAdministration of Daxiangling Nature Reserve, Yaan, 625000, Sichuan, China.
Hong YangAdministration of Daxiangling Nature Reserve, Yaan, 625000, Sichuan, China.
Xiaodong GuSichuan Forestry and Grassland Bureau, Chengdu, 610082, China.
Haijun GuSichuan Forestry and Grassland Bureau, Chengdu, 610082, China.
Qian ZhangSichuan Forestry and Grassland Bureau, Chengdu, 610082, China.
Dunwu QiThe Conservation of Endangered Wildlife Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding, Chengdu, 610000, Sichuan, China. qidunwu@163.com.

Funding

Chengdu Giant Panda Breeding Research Foundation 2024CPB-A23Chengdu Giant Panda Breeding Research Foundation 2024CPB-B06Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding CAZG2025C13National Natural Science Foundation of China 32400405National Natural Science Foundation of China U21A20193Sichuan Provincial Science and Technology Support Program 25NSFSC1714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The biggest challenge during the reintroduction of captive giant pandas into the wild is their ability to adapt to the natural environment, and the role of gut microbiota in this process remains unknown. Here, the gut microbiota was analyzed and categorized into training, exploration (1-3 months post-release) and stable period (4-6 months post-release) by activity intensity of released pandas. We found that the gut microbiota diversity of pandas was significantly higher during the stable period compared to the training period. Streptococcus was significantly enriched in the training period, but Clostridium became significantly enriched after being released. KEGG functional prediction analysis revealed that during the stable phase, carbohydrate and amino acids metabolism was significantly reduced, while pathways associated with cofactors and vitamins, other amino acids, lipids, nucleotide and energy metabolism were markedly enriched. This suggests that, after a three-month acclimation period, the transformation of the gut microbiota provides reintroduced giant pandas with more diverse energy acquisition strategies suited to the wild environment. This finding highlighted that the first 3 months post-release are a critical exploration period for digestive adaptation to the wild environment, which will help guide the implementation of future monitoring efforts post-release.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalGastrointestinal MicrobiomeUrsidaeAnimalsAdaptive changesGiant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca)Gut microbiotaReintroduction

Identifiers

PMID40849504
PMCPMC12375047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.