ArticleScientific reports2025
Adaptive changes in the intestinal microbiota of giant pandas following reintroduction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Grass supplementation to a pellet-based diet fails to enrich gut microbiomes with wild-like functions in captive-bred hares.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Giant panda seasonal adaptations in feeding strategies and blood physiology.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The biggest challenge during the reintroduction of captive giant pandas into the wild is their ability to adapt to the natural environment, and the role of gut microbiota in this process remains unknown. Here, the gut microbiota was analyzed and categorized into training, exploration (1-3 months post-release) and stable period (4-6 months post-release) by activity intensity of released pandas. We found that the gut microbiota diversity of pandas was significantly higher during the stable period compared to the training period. Streptococcus was significantly enriched in the training period, but Clostridium became significantly enriched after being released. KEGG functional prediction analysis revealed that during the stable phase, carbohydrate and amino acids metabolism was significantly reduced, while pathways associated with cofactors and vitamins, other amino acids, lipids, nucleotide and energy metabolism were markedly enriched. This suggests that, after a three-month acclimation period, the transformation of the gut microbiota provides reintroduced giant pandas with more diverse energy acquisition strategies suited to the wild environment. This finding highlighted that the first 3 months post-release are a critical exploration period for digestive adaptation to the wild environment, which will help guide the implementation of future monitoring efforts post-release.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.