Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40849488›Full record

ArticleBehavioral and brain functions : BBF2025

Behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia as a model for understanding the cognitive and cerebral determinants of verbal creativity.

Victor Altmayer, Marcela Ovando-Tellez, Théophile Bieth, Bénédicte Batrancourt, Armelle Rametti-Lacroux, Lucy Bernardaud, Sarah Moreno-Rodriguez, Lucie Vigreux, Vincent Ledu, Béatrice Garcin and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral and brain functions : BBF, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Victor AltmayerSorbonne University, Institut du Cerveau - Paris Brain Institute - ICM, FrontLab, Inserm, CNRS, AP-HP, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France. victoraltmayer@hotmail.com.
Marcela Ovando-Tellez *Sorbonne University, Institut du Cerveau - Paris Brain Institute - ICM, FrontLab, Inserm, CNRS, AP-HP, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Théophile Bieth *Sorbonne University, Institut du Cerveau - Paris Brain Institute - ICM, FrontLab, Inserm, CNRS, AP-HP, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Bénédicte BatrancourtSorbonne University, Institut du Cerveau - Paris Brain Institute - ICM, FrontLab, Inserm, CNRS, AP-HP, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Armelle Rametti-LacrouxSorbonne University, Institut du Cerveau - Paris Brain Institute - ICM, FrontLab, Inserm, CNRS, AP-HP, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Lucy BernardaudSorbonne University, Institut du Cerveau - Paris Brain Institute - ICM, FrontLab, Inserm, CNRS, AP-HP, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Sarah Moreno-RodriguezSorbonne University, Institut du Cerveau - Paris Brain Institute - ICM, FrontLab, Inserm, CNRS, AP-HP, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Lucie VigreuxSorbonne University, Institut du Cerveau - Paris Brain Institute - ICM, FrontLab, Inserm, CNRS, AP-HP, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Vincent LeduSorbonne University, Institut du Cerveau - Paris Brain Institute - ICM, FrontLab, Inserm, CNRS, AP-HP, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Béatrice GarcinSorbonne University, Institut du Cerveau - Paris Brain Institute - ICM, FrontLab, Inserm, CNRS, AP-HP, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Raffaella MigliaccioSorbonne University, Institut du Cerveau - Paris Brain Institute - ICM, FrontLab, Inserm, CNRS, AP-HP, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Isabelle Le BerSorbonne University, Institut du Cerveau - Paris Brain Institute - ICM, FrontLab, Inserm, CNRS, AP-HP, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Alizée Lopez-PersemSorbonne University, Institut du Cerveau - Paris Brain Institute - ICM, FrontLab, Inserm, CNRS, AP-HP, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Richard LevySorbonne University, Institut du Cerveau - Paris Brain Institute - ICM, FrontLab, Inserm, CNRS, AP-HP, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Emmanuelle VolleSorbonne University, Institut du Cerveau - Paris Brain Institute - ICM, FrontLab, Inserm, CNRS, AP-HP, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
ECOCAPTURE study group

Funding

ANID-CONICYT Becas-ChileFondation pour la Recherche Médicale M2R202003011383
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough creativity is an essential cognitive function to adapt to an ever-changing world, its neurocognitive and cerebral bases still need clarification. Current models highlight the interaction between associative and executive processes underpinned by the default mode (DMN), executive control (ECN) and salience networks (SN). Furthermore, recent neuroimaging studies highlight the key role of the prefrontal cortex (PFC), located at the crossroads of these networks. Hence, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), characterized by progressive neurodegeneration principally impacting the prefrontal cortex and the intrinsic connectivity of these three creativity-related networks, represents a unique model to study creativity. In this study involving 14 bvFTD patients and 20 matched controls, we used a simple word-to-word association task (FGAT) to explore the specific cognitive processes involved in remote thinking, i.e., the production of creative semantic associations. Using voxel-based morphometry, we uncovered critical brain regions for each component and then characterized these regions' intrinsic connectivity profiles using resting-state functional connectivity in healthy controls.

resultsWe dissociated four key cognitive components underlying remote thinking: spontaneous associative thinking, inhibition of unoriginal responses, intentional remote associative thinking, and verbal initiation; and replicated them in three independent datasets. Spontaneous associative thinking relied on temporal and cerebellar regions involved in low-order and automatic semantic processing, connected with the DMN, ECN and SN. Inhibition of prepotent unoriginal responses depended on key nodes of the SN. The ability to intentionally generate remote semantic associations was underpinned by key regions of the DMN. Finally, initiation of verbal responses relied on the right dorsolateral PFC, connected to the ECN. BvFTD patients were impaired in the last three components. Two components, cognitive inhibition and intentional remote thinking, mediated the link between atrophy in critical regions and an independent measure of creative abilities.

conclusionsThese findings advance our understanding of creative neurocognition, distinguishing components of creative thinking and clarifying their critical cerebral bases, and participate in the characterization of creativity impairment in patients with bvFTD.

Indexed as

CognitionCreativityFrontotemporal DementiaAgedBrainBrain MappingExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsPrefrontal CortexThinkingCreativityExecutive functionsFrontotemporal dementiaRemote thinkingResting state functional connectivitySemantic associationsVoxel-based morphometry

Identifiers

PMID40849488
PMCPMC12374279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.