ArticleBMC medical education2025
The practical year: a qualitative study on stressors, resources and proposed improvements among medical students.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe last academic year in medical faculties in Germany is the so-called practical year (PY), which is a combination of studying and on-the-job clinical training. Based on research documenting considerable stress among both medical students and resident physicians it can be assumed that PY students likewise experience high levels of stress. However, evidence remains sparse for medical students in the practical year in Germany and elsewhere.
methodsPY students at a German medical school were recruited via purposeful and snowball sampling and semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted by telephone. Data collection was carried out until data saturation was reached. The interviews were voice-recorded, transcribed verbatim and content-analyzed using MAXQDA software (2020).
resultsEighteen female and seven male participants (n = 25; mean age: 26.6 years; standard deviation (SD = 3.7)) were interviewed (mean duration = 36 min with SD = 7.6). Mentioned stressors included a lack of skills and knowledge, poor supervision, routine tasks (i.e., lack of learning experiences due to repetitive work), lack of appreciation (mainly on the part of superiors) and a heavy workload. Resources included working with patients and their appreciation, a positive learning and working atmosphere on the wards, learning and knowledge acquisition, one-on-one supervision by a medical colleague, clinical-practical training as well as a positive work-life balance with sufficient leisure time. Among other things, the PY students suggested a better pay and a change in absence regulations as well as the opportunity to take care of their own patients and to have structured PY teaching.
conclusionPY students perceived multiple stressors, but also resources and suggested potential improvements. There is a subjective need for improvements of the working and training conditions in the PY. However, further studies are required to quantify and prioritize those needs and to explore the feasibility of the suggested interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.