Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40849456›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2025

Partial splenectomy and pericardial devascularization for symptomatic patients with portal hypertension: a single-center retrospective study.

Ying Zhang, Shengzhi Wang, Jinghui Yang, Jinxiang Bu, Feng Liang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ying Zhang *Senior Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Fuxin Road, No.28, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China.
Shengzhi Wang *Senior Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Fuxin Road, No.28, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China.
Jinghui YangDepartment of Acceleration Physiology, Air Force Medical Center, Beijing, 100142, China.
Jinxiang BuDivision of General Surgery, Dehong Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No.87, Nanbeng Road, Mang City, Dehong Prefecture, Yunnan, China.
Feng LiangSenior Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Fuxin Road, No.28, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China. lfpeakcool@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe dilemma of current treatments for symptomatic patients with portal hypertension is how to resolve the problems of the varices and hypersplenism simultaneously and meanwhile preserve the splenic function. Partial splenectomy and pericardial devascularization is a potential alternative to currently used approaches, but it is incompletely defined. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of partial splenectomy and pericardial devascularization.

methodsThis study followed 132 symptomatic patients with portal hypertension who underwent partial splenectomy and pericardial devascularization in the General Surgery Department of the Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital from 2016 to 2023. Clinical, laboratory, endoscopic examination and imaging data were collected and compared between preoperative and postoperative levels at intervals using a mixed linear model.

resultsAll 132 patients with portal hypertension successfully underwent partial splenectomy and pericardial devascularization without intraoperative uncontrolled massive bleeding or death. Leucocyte and platelet counts increased to normal levels at intervals from 1 year to ≥ 4 years postoperatively. Among the patients followed for six months postoperatively, 23 (52.27%) showed improvement in esophagogastric varices, 19 (43.18%) had no significant changes in their condition, and 2 (4.55%) experienced worsening of the varices. At subsequent follow-ups, the majority of patients either showed improvements or no change in their esophagogastric varices, with only a small fraction experiencing worsening of the condition. The splenic remnant survived in most patients, and regrowth was very limited postoperatively, while 13 (9.85%) patients splenic remnant necrosis during follow-up. Liver failure was observed in 5 (3.79%) patients postoperatively, and 3 (2.27%) of them died perioperatively. Portal vein thrombosis was found in 90 (75%) patients the 7th days after surgery. With the progression of follow-up time, the proportion of patients with postoperative portal vein system thrombosis decreased over time. 3 (2.27%) patients experienced postoperative abdominal bleeding, which improved after emergency surgery for hemostasis.

conclusionsPartial Splenectomy and Pericardial Devascularization appears to be a safe and effective approach to treat symptomatic patients with Portal Hypertension, while preserving the potential function of the spleen.

Indexed as

Esophageal and Gastric VaricesHypersplenismHypertension, PortalSplenectomyVascular Surgical ProceduresAdultChinaCombined Modality TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrgan Sparing TreatmentsPericardiumPostoperative ComplicationsGastroesophageal varicesHypersplenismPartial splenectomyPericardial devascularizationPortal hypertension

Identifiers

PMID40849456
PMCPMC12374345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.