ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2025
Classification of first embryonic division stages of multiple Caenorhabditis species by deep learning.
Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The first embryonic division of Caenorhabditis elegans is a model for asymmetric cell division, and identifying the stages of cell division across related species could improve our understanding of the divergence of cellular events and mechanisms. Comparative microscopy of evolutionarily divergent species continues to rely on label-free differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy due to technical challenges in molecular tagging, with the identification of cell division stages still relying on label-free microscopy. Here, we compare multiple deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) trained to automate cell stage classification in DIC microscopy movies and interpret the results, with code and classification weights released as OpenSource. The networks are trained to identify if a single frame of a time-series belongs to one of the four morphologically distinct stages: (i) pro-nuclear migration, (ii) centration and rotation, (iii) spindle displacement and (iv) cytokinesis, that had been manually labeled. Three previously described networks, ResNet, VggNet, and EfficientNet, and a customized shallow network, which we refer to as EvoCellNet, achieved 91% or greater accuracy in test data from 23 different nematode species. We find activation vectors of the CNNs of the sparse EvoCellNet correlate with spatial localization of intracellular features of multiple species, such as pro-nuclei, spindle, and spindle-poles. While the pipeline is robust when applied to comparable DIC time-series of C. elegans and C. briggsae embryos, distinct from those on which it was trained and tested, successful classification is limited to images with conserved morphological features. Thus, deep learning networks can be used to generalize the morphological changes across species of nematode embryos, capturing chronology based on low-level intracellular features with biological relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.