Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40849344›Full record

ReviewJournal of public health policy2025

Mitigating PFAS contamination in the United States: assessing the impact of California's legislation from 2018 to 2022 on drinking water quality.

Sameer D Bagga, Iris J N Parshley, Lindsay Tallon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of public health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sameer D BaggaNew York University School of Liberal Studies, 726 Broadway, New York, NY, 10003, USA. sdb7903@nyu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-3333-5209
Iris J N ParshleyInternational Research Institute of North Carolina, Durham, NC, USA.
Lindsay TallonInternational Research Institute of North Carolina, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluates the impact of California's specific per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) legislation on perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) contamination levels in public drinking water. We conducted a comparative statistical analysis using data collected by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rules (UCMRs), specifically UCMR 3 and UCMR 5. To assess PFOA and PFOS levels in active public water systems during the pre-legislation period (2017) and the post-legislation period (2023) we applied Levene's test to assess differences in variances, followed by unpaired and Welch's t-tests to compare mean PFAS concentrations between the two time periods. We detected a significant decline in both PFOA and PFOS levels post-legislation, suggesting that robust state-level regulatory measures can effectively reduce PFAS contamination. Findings highlight the potential for California's comprehensive approach to serve as a model for national policy to mitigate PFAS exposure and protect public health.

Indexed as

Alkanesulfonic AcidsCaprylatesDrinking WaterFluorocarbonsWater Pollutants, ChemicalWater QualityCaliforniaEnvironmental MonitoringHumansUnited StatesUnited States Environmental Protection AgencyAlkanesulfonic AcidsCaprylatesDrinking WaterFluorocarbonsperfluorooctane sulfonic acidperfluorooctanoic acidWater Pollutants, ChemicalCaliforniaDrinking waterEnvironmental justicePFASPolicy analysis

Identifiers

PMID40849344
PMCPMC12586170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.